The Universe - Scaler Reality - Fractal Cosmology

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,359
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 20, 2009

Quod est inferius est sicut quod est superius
That is above, similarly to that is below

Scaler Reality or Fractal Cosmology is a self-similar cosmological paradigm. From subatomic particles to superclusters of galaxies, nature has a nested hierarchal organization and self-similar structure...similar form on different size scales, as the fundamental property of the cosmological hierarchy.

"To see a World in a Grain of Sand
And a Heaven in a Wild Flower,
Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand
And Eternity in an hour"
-William Blake

Example of Scaler Reality/Fractal Cosmology: The human body is a community of approximately 50 trillion cells. Everything the body does, the cell does as well. Cells have respiratory and expiratory systems, they feed, feel, think, and communicate with other cells. Scale up and these trillions of cells make up a single organism called the human body. Scale up again and 6 billion plus human bodies help to make up the organism we call Earth. Scale up ad infinitum...

Plato wrote in his Timaeus: "...this world...a single visible living entity containing all other living entities, which by their nature are all related...the Cosmos is a single living Creature which contains all living creatures within it."

We are all related, all one...the Universe seeking to know Itself through Itself.

"I am the Atman that dwells in the heart of every mortal creature: I am the beginning, the life-span, and the end of all...I am the ocean among waters...I am the sacred syllable OM...I am Time...I am the Divine Seed of all that lives. In this world, nothing animate or inanimate exists without me...There is no limit to my divine manifestations, nor can they be numbered...one atom of myself sustains the Universe."
-- Bhagavad-Gita 88-90


Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SlimD11 Similar... these are closed systems that have to cooperate or they would not exist and you would not witness them. If an atom or a solar system or a galactic cluster did not act in the way you observe it it and you would not exist for the observation to happen. Nature does exist in a state of feedback but in a different form from say the gravitational paths of planets around a star.

  • Nature behaves differently at these different levels. Like frequencies, it affects the basic mathematical construct of the multiverse and creates our reality.

  • wtf mila kunis...i do not want to watch you smoke

  • Gee, I just learned a lot of new words for smallness!

  • taking string theory into account, the subatomic regime, goes one level deeper.

  • 1:57, Cat face.

  • Dear Wonderers,

    My name is Mark Maloney; I would like to invite you to visit my website Epluribusunum56. com. There you will find entirely new physics and cosmology, called Proto-space and DSFF, which are the formational mechanics composing all aspects composing our universe. The best way to learn something new is to securitize it looking for errors. I welcome your opinions.

    Sincerely, Mark Maloney

  • that was beautiful

    thank you

  • @SlimD11

    "This unification,or entanglement,is infinite regardless of the size or scale."

    It is isn't it! It's as though "what is" is the root. Reality. Truth. That stands easily enough on it's own.

    Here is the kicker. I can say right now, "you are." No one would disagree.

    But given the statement you just made about entanglement, the only thing allowing me to say that 2500 years ago is semantics. "You will be", I'd have to say, but really, even 2500 years ago, "you are" seems correct too.

  • @D33veeoss

    Wow, deep stuff. There is truth to what you say friend.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more