RAND PAUL vs. RACHEL MADDOW PT 2

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• rand paul
• us news
• politics
• msnbc
• rachel maddow
• media fail
• federaljack
• federaljacktube
• senate
• congress

[slewofdamascus]

He makes a very valid point, quite frankly, and he correctly diagnosed the intellectual versus political debate, and how the political debate automatically makes any substantive debate impossible, because many people do not have the ability to make the kinds of political-intellectual distinctions that this conversation demands. Rachel Maddow set him up as a racist here and I think it was patently unfair and disengenuous.

[BrinkmanTraining]

I wish I had a list of all of the people Rachele has called racist...

[brianbela]

Rand Paul dodged the question Rachel was trying to get him to answer THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW:"Do you support the rights of business owners to discriminate?"

And tho he dodged it with semantics,Rands answer was YES! HA! Just like his dad. Sorry,Rand is a libertarian slimeball fascist.Folks,we NEED a REAL govt,"of the people,to protect US from predatory business owners,and to protect human rights.We dont need someone like Ron Paul as president who would dismantle what little protections we have left

[MontajBlaze]

(Continued) The '10th' is unnecessary(and HAS bee misused as an 'umbrella law' to infringe on rights) and is self 'regulated' by people simply NOT choosing to support that private business/property with their money/time, and anyone who truly does not condone racism will join with you(Boycotting them would be a much more Constitutional option..)

[MontajBlaze]

I think the biggest thing Rachel is missing here is the fact that with the 'lunch counter' situation , the government was in a position where it did not punish someone for violent acts committed because of that. The '9 out of the 10', would prevent the actual harm done, because those people would go to jail and NOT have someone on the government side of things that supports there actions. There would be CONSEQUENCES for their violence.

[zedsdeadz]

Paul is saying government has a lack of power to mandate such things. The issue isn't whether he is racist or not, but that he views government's scope as precluding itself from 'going there' to begin with. From that limitation then, the slippery slopes Maddow brings up can be avoided. Less is more.

[AMERICANSTEW5]

Ask yourself why dose RACHEL support segregation in Israel?

[garyonthenetube]

I am a libertarian and I agree with Rand's position, but there has got to be a better way with dealing with this direct question "Would you support the abolition of laws illegalizing right of private businesses to discriminate against people they don't wand to serve.

I have a better answer, at least a talking point that could deflect this question. It is a matter of implied warranty of a public servicing business.

[garyonthenetube]

Rachael was correct in her targeted question. Rand dodged the the direct question.

Perhaps that was the right thing to do politically, but the dodge and misdirection was too obvious.

I am a libertarian and I agree with Rand's position, but there has got to be a better way with dealing with this direct question "Would you support the

[MsBoss243]

this guys sick that y he s the darling of the crazy tea baggers