JP
Upload

Dr Chris Busby: radioactivity in apartment in central Tokyo Part 2

drdrwoland drdrwoland·79 videos
380
6,282
Like     Dislike 1

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like drdrwoland's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike drdrwoland's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add drdrwoland's video to your playlist.

Published on Jul 25, 2012

Here is Part 2 in which Dr Busby describes measurements made on an airconditing unit filter from inside an apartment in central Tokyo. This was sent by a lady in Tokyo who wanted to know if it was safe to live there. The filter only collected air from inside the apartment. It shows the presence of 130000Bq/kg radioCaesium in the dust plus enriched Uranium and for the first time Lead-210/Polonium-210. The apartment was evacuated from the

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (29)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • jack99889988

    There is no reason that Fukushima should have anywhere less cancer causing than chernobyl. Children living in Kiev as well as those liquidators increased their chance of having cancer by over 300%. How can you even claim you calculated it only increase 3~5% cancer from fallout? Also, the study of hot radiation particles' effect is not known because it is both too complex and lack financial support throughout the world.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jack99889988's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jack99889988's comment.
    in reply to cbu5by (Show the comment)
  • jack99889988

    Well that is some bs calculation you claimed sir. Dr.Chris Busby have data from 1986 chernobyl effect caused 11% cancer increase in Sweden. Think about it, lets say distance from Stockholm to Kiev is about 2300km cancer increases by 11% from 1 nuclear plant suffer from nuclear explosion vs. Tokyo to Fukushima is only about 300km and the nuclear plant in Japan unit 3 suffer nuclear explosion, unit 4 leave dry pool outside of environment, 1 steam explosion. 3-5% is a joke. it should be 30-50%.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jack99889988's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jack99889988's comment.
    in reply to cbu5by (Show the comment)
  • joelb79

    Bi-214 would not be present in any air filter sample after 7 days. I do not agree with your po-210 assessment as one would expect to see no Bi-214 after 7 days of decay.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate joelb79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate joelb79's comment.
  • musick2138

    "sample contains..." [a (link to a) file with these data would be *really*nice-2-have*; 4 my archive:] all activities in kBq/kg...

    Cs-134 ... 42

    Cs-137 ... 68

    Pb-210 ... 7.5 (but no Bi-214)

    U-238 ... 3

    U-235 ... 0.24 "

    (iaanm,) Act(U238/U235)= 12.5 => 1.2% U235 ... certainly no natural U

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate musick2138's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate musick2138's comment.
  • drdrwoland

    There are 2 devices. The PC screen shows gamma ray spectrum from a liquid nitrogen cooled HPGe detector with a multichannel analyser. The other thing in Part 1 was the Elektra / DP2 probe thing which does the betas, gammas and alphas; that one doesnt do the energy spectrum.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drdrwoland's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drdrwoland's comment.
    in reply to liutasx (Show the comment)
  • liutasx

    Does this device detect only gamma rays or also and beta "rays"?

    How you are distinguishing between different isotopes, which emits gamma rays (by energy)?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate liutasx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate liutasx's comment.
    in reply to cbu5by (Show the comment)
  • cbu5by

    Pu is an alpha emitter, no gamma. Pu-239 decays to U-235 which has weak gamma. There is plenty of U-235 in the sample and also its daughter Th231also weak gamma. So that could be from Plutonium or it could be directly from the fallout. Impossible to distinguish.

    Chris

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbu5by's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbu5by's comment.
    in reply to liutasx (Show the comment)
  • liutasx

    Why this technique don't detect plutonium in the sample?

    We know plutonium decay products, why we don't these products in the sample?

    That is difference detecting uranium 235 or 238 and plutonium 239 and other isotopes?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate liutasx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate liutasx's comment.
    in reply to cbu5by (Show the comment)
  • cbu5by

    I have calculated on the basis of the average contamination levels for Tokyo that there will be about 3-5% increase in cancer due to the fallout from Fukushima. But there is not a lot of data on the fallout

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbu5by's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbu5by's comment.
    in reply to Louis Stalnaker (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later