How Far is Israel From Having a Constiution? Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
325 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2006

Minister of Kenesset Professor Menahem Ben Sasson, Chairman of the Knesset Committee on Constitution, Law and Justice speaks from Jerusalem via videoconference to law students at the University of Ottawa on the status of an Israeli Constitution.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If you want to bury your head in the sand and ignore your regimes mass killing and collective punishment whilst at the same time expect sympathy go right ahead. You can explain to your god later why you supported the mass killing and offer him your excuses.

  • Because you fail to understand that its not about the ratio, the fact that they manage to hit less people is irrelevant.

  • i think its pretty clear you failed to address the original post.......8:1 = STATE TERRORISM

  • 1st: got does not exist.

    Israel's occupation would have been over years ago if there was no terror. so .. you stick your head in the sand. keep advertising your false propaganda and keep thinking there is only your opinion that counts :) enjoy

  • and god said...."though shalt defend thyself before being attacked and kill them first"....NOT!

    you are trying to defend the indefencable and anyone reading this thread can see that you are sticking your head in the sand when it comes to israeli terrorism.

  • Do you know the meaning of a pre-emptive strike?

    Well, sometimes (and its accepted by international law) a country can pre emptively attack another country if its being threatened by it, well, we are being attacked constently by missles, and almost every israeli attack, exept thouse who retaliate, is an attack which comes as a pre-emptive strike.. so please, If you want to mock my intelect, know the facts.

  • strangly enough YES, you should only fire when fired apon, its an old concept called using minimum force required in self defence. strange concept for the average israeli intellect i know but none the less "a basic humane principle of respecting life". I have no reason to mail somebody who fails to have an ounce of understanding that mass killing has a tendancy to create a lot of resentment or even fanatical hatred.

  • So you suggest we should fire back only if they attack and kill ? so that the ratio will be "ok" or reasonable ? Is that all the things we should take in mind? really... I dont like the killing.. I dont like the occupation, But when Hamas is stating that we dont have a right to live, I get pissed off... I'm sorry its not that easy. If you want to talk about it with me, you can PM me and I'll give you my mail

  • did i say do not fire back?. No, MY POINT WAS TO POINT OUT THAT ETHICAL SELF DEFENCE HAS NOTHING IN COMMON WITH MASS KILLING AT AN 8 to 1 RATIO.

  • I think its even easier to tell us to refrain from using force while sitting in the UK, having fun, while we are getting attacked each day by terrorists from gaza strip.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more