Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

I Mathematically Prove Soulmates

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
276 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Oct 8, 2011

A rough draft of a lecture I will give in April.

Margarita's Myspace
http://www.myspace.com/margarita

Margarita's YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/user/MargaritaShamrakov

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheFaustianMan)

  • Hahahah! Where to economists fall in the spectrum of academic echelons? It is a pretty math heavy disciplin.

  • @BCPodcast Dicey question! Because on one hand you have the economists, who, while use math, are not in and of themselves great mathematicians. And on the other end of the spectrum you have mathematicians who win The Nobel Prize under the "economics" category because a mathematician ran off with Alfred Nobel's wife, therefore there is no "mathematics" category...

    I'm not touching that one with a 10 ft pole. hahaha!

  • Deep video Faust, sad that soulmates only last for a short while as death intervenes in all cases. Faster than light travel in a vacuum you surmise? Persons should question all reports they see in the media about faster than light particles, scientists lie and make mistakes. Brian Greene is highly skeptical about this as am I. As for soulmates see the following video. watch?v=PKY-smJ6aBQ

    It is always gratifying to see people who are happy they have found soulmates without divorce. Bless pets.

  • @spacetimewarp Thank you. I couldn't agree more. Far too often people don't challenge science and I am afraid popularized science even less. A while ago NASA announced a completely new strain of bacteria and very few people batted an eye. Now that claim in Europe.

    However, the formula is actually a double edged sword when it comes to FTL in this case. Because, it is actually built upon an old Einstein formula △x△p>or=ħ/2

    So in this case it works but it has its detractors - as well it should.

  • @spacetimewarp And thanks for the vid too! =)

  • What of multiple soulmates? Could there be multiple others that collective unify to become a contingent soulmate since time or space is somewhat irrelevant?

  • @StylinKaos Well so far the other object has only been done with two. Yes, under this theorem it would be irrelevant because the "others" would be unified as they are traveling FTL (Faster than light) or rather transmitting information faster than the speed of light, hence the causality (and verily spacetime) becomes unimportant.

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @kingdomofchrissmith Or just google "Forever Alone" and click on the know your meme result.

  • @kingdomofchrissmith

    Well if she is, then you're already together. It only appears she is going to Japan to work. ;)

    knowyourmeme(.)com(/)memes/for­ever-alone#.TpIS3XKuWSo

  • @ABombs1 hahaha! You rock! that made me lol. Good one!

  • Dammit!

    Now, not only is my soulmate one in approximately 6,775,235,700...

    they may not even be in this solar system!

    So much for learning German. Now I have to learn Glib/glub/blurp!

    Yeah . . . I'm dying alone...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more