A comparsion between One After 909 - 1963 Demo and 1969
Top Comments
All Comments (266)
-
just 6 years, such a difference
-
funny that it was written in 1957
-
I love both versions...so hard to choose between the two!
-
@gkallenbach Yeah it has a much more generic "rock n roll" sound wheras by 1970 the beatles had opened their minds with lsd and could play better
-
1963
-
the first 4 seconds is orgasmic
-
@gkallenbach Even Paul, on the outtake, mentioned that he disliked playing a single note in the song. Listen to the rooftop version. He gets to jump around the bass a bit.
-
i think the 1969 versiohn is waaayyyyyyyyyyy better than the original 1963 version.
Just sayin'.
-
Yes, confirmed Billy Preston on the piano !! And by 1969 The Beatles had aged like a fine wine!!! AWESOME.......People that say the Beatles are just ok, they
don't understand how cutting edge and what pioneers they were. They went and cleared a path and then everyone just got on the road and improved by technology! But THEY did it and Blazed a trail. Beatles were the turning point of what the world had known up until then !!! PLEASE SHOW THE RESPECT THEY DESERVE !!!! THANK GOD FOR THEM !



In 1963 - children (but talented). In 1969 - adults & wise.
Volly6661 8 months ago in playlist Beatles 9
I prefer the 1963 version because it captures the excitement of the group's early years. They were still performing at the Cavern when this was recorded.
maxpowers518 4 months ago 3