Split voting results to be revealed 31st of July!

Powered by http://www.eurovision.tv
The split jury- and televoting results of the Final of the 2009 Eurovision Song Contest will be revealed this Friday, the 31st of July. Mark it in your calendar!

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• eurovision
• song
• contest
• 2009
• jury
• televoting
• EBU

[eurovision]

The results have been checked by two independent auditors to make sure they are correct. Because these checks are thorough, it took some time :)

[wishmaster198]

New system is terrible. Back to 100% televoting please! :)

[HatMMMMMM]

Who garanties full transparency and no corruption?...

[hannesthefreakl]

I do miss the full transparency for 2010 and 2011.

[dirofreak]

@megalalio

of course, but Big 4 countries and people that give a s*** about the contest simply don't care.

Common viewers will agree with juries return because commentators and the EBU knew how to sell the idea based on facts that aren't even true! The so-called political voting that exist more with juries than televoting)

I guess it's up to artists and producers to decide whether the system is good or not. If they're satisfied with such a rigged contest, i guess there's nothing we can do.

[megalalio]

I can not believe my eyes!! Spain had qualified in 12th position itself was taken into account the televoting!! 106 points is not only one poised to overtake Russia's televoting who got 107, and Germany had won the same, note for the EBU, is more than clear that if there is no politics televoting is simply take a song you like to the public and France would be classified in 8th position, eye televoting last year put him in 17th position, so I want to see those results Now!

[cvetzjuga]

Why are the names of the jurt from each country have not been revealed after the show was over? Where are these people voting from? From their own country or from the host country? If these people vote from the host country, is not there any chance that their impartiality be affected someway? either by communicating with each other or with the contestants? Split voting results may be revealed, yes, but yet there still seems to be many other things we do not know.

[hannesthefreakl]

where are the split results for eurovision 2010?

[hannesthefreakl]

a) because most important is NOT to give a professional (means either musicmarket-orientated or high-quality in a musicologic view) review. see point c)

b) I'm happy for you you can choose. I and 99.9999% can not.

c) I know 'bout problems with televoting. and yes, there is something like that. even not the way you might think of. however, if the EBU would be interested in a "fairer" voting, she would take other measurs. like an one-call-each-person-rule or sending professional juries.

[callmestef]

a) WHY THEY ARE JURIES THEN???

B) WE SHOULD CHOOSE WHO DO WE WANT TO BE JURY

C) no the mission is to have fair and to stop the political and diaspora voting

[hannesthefreakl]

Ay ya can see they are some people disagree with the new system.

here are some reasons:

a) a lot of jury-members don't have any notion of music

b) even if jurors would be professional, five persons each country are too sparse coz there aren't presentable.

c) it's clearly to see juror's mission is to move points to western european countries so they stay and furthermore pay money

-> horrible songs (israel, germany) get better results against public's will.

-> other countries will leave.

[hannesthefreakl]

maybe the just had likes songs?!

[dirofreak]

There a plenty of reasons .(mainly technical ones)

But there's 2 killer ones:

1) Many contestants are more pro than the jury that vote

2)People buy CD , not juries