Big Government Health Care PSA

A newspaper I like! I don't read the daily mail! Its shit, al its good for is the TV guide! And you talk to me about non partisan! Take a leaf out of your own booK! you have been pwned on thsi issue over and over again, yet you keep coming back with a weaker and weaker argument, with sources that are completely false or bias! Btw I looked at one of your links and LOL! You love to pick percentages and clearly missrepresent data don't you! Well see I don't have to do that.

YOU ARE QUOTING THE DAILY MAIL! GET SOME REAL SOURCES! The daily mail is the same company as the Sun you fool! Its completely right wing, slightly racist and VERY VERY BIAS! Fucking hell your research skills are useless! Have you ever heard of non partisan sources! People with an agenda window dress and the daily mail support the conservatives, like I said, the NHS is a political issue! Are you really this stupid or is it an act?!

LOL are you seriously suggesting that Healthcare Economist is a partisan trade paper?
If you look at the section titled Praise for HC Economist, you will see that they have all the integrity necessary to be taken seriously, recognized by economist magazine an Slate Magazine.

unlike you.

your constant ad hominem is childish, why don't you go tell families that lost loved ones because of UHC that their loved ones aren't really dead because they are not reported as dead by a newspaper you like.

Indeed, the entire system does need were formed. However, what it needs to do is to move away from government intervention and more into a free market solution.
Let's look at your shining example for Europe and what they've done lately.

dailymail(.)co(.)uk/news/artic le-1231197/70-deaths-Basildon- University-Hospital--Patients- neglected-nurses-filthy-blood- spattered-casualty-unit-says-r eport.html

70 of your countrymen dying in squalor, but protect the system at all cost good job.

Incorrect, what you say sounds good but doesn't tell the whole story.
Wait, times have an incredibly detrimental factor. In regards to situations that seem non-pressing but then that result in life endangering or in some cases, grotesquely debilitating circumstances.

I'll start sending you some links to stories that show that wait times in Canada have resulted in people losing limbs or outright dying because what was essentially deemed at the time a non-urgent operation resulted in tragedy

Its essentially a PR site for the US private system! And you are using data from a PR source? Well you have some serious brains there.

It is the entire system that needs reform in the US, not just the private but the public. just because its public, doesn't make it the same thing as something like the NHS. Its restricted by the entire system. Also, you honestly think the insurers work on an 8% margin!? Are you honestly suggesting that? Again you are getting your data from bias sources! Look at that! healthcare-economist! Who the fuck do you think runs it you damn fool! And to what end?! NEXT

UHC was first introduced in Canada in the early 50's but the increase in wait times for non-urgent operations is more recent. (if you need an operation right away you get it right away.) Both the causes & the solutions are independent of the UHC financing system.
The wait time problem has been grossly exaggerated by those who want to block h.c. reform in the U.S. It's doubly absurd when you realize that nothing in the bill would make the U.S. system line that of Canada's.

lol reasonsbadly1000 that still thinks he won?
newsbusters(.)org/blogs/tom-bl umer/2009/10/06/deny-guess-who -has-highest-medical-claim-rej ection-rate
Medicare turns down more people than private insurance.
healthcare-economist(.)com/200 6/07/27/medicares-true-adminis trative-costs/

The administrative cost for Medicare is roughly 5% private insurers profit margins are roughly 8%, which included administrative costs.

Why is paying 3% more for more services and more access to health care bad?

Either way, it still results in an average wait time of 17 weeks, as well as a massive rationing and denial of service