FreeBSD versus Linux 2
Top Comments
All Comments (180)
-
240p we meet again
-
UNIX licensing demanded that licensees recognize the fact that they were entitled to modify UNIX to make their distributions unique supporting branding and marketing in general. Microsoft, Novell, HP and Sun Microsystems (now Oracle) all licensed UNIX from AT&T and then branded their own versions as licensed requirement. They had to refactor at a minimum -- fact; Xenix is in fact MS UNIX too - kudos.
-
@Houndx6 actually they made their own called Xenix
-
BSD and Linux have similarities, but aanyone that knows the internals of Linux and BSD know that they are not siblings or related. Each system is an individual and unique O.S. and for those who argue the fact do so at your own risk or learn to read! Also, Microsoft used to license UNIX from AT&T ;-) You knew that though hunh?
-
it is weird how fonts look on both freebsd Linux but it looks weirder on solaris
-
Watching this was fun! ...like rival siblings who ultimately are wishing the best for each other.
-
openbsd is the most secure operating system in the world. If you're really concerned about security
-
Slackware is on more servers than people know... Linux is a comparable server operating system even when compared to freebsd...what a stupid show.
-
Slackware > FreeBSD
-
Slackware would have beat the hell out of freeBSD why did he choose SuSe is he trying to give Novell props or what?
I used to like FreeBSD over linux, but with the latest versions of linux, mainly Ubuntu, Linux can now easily take over windows for non-hardcore gamers.
eurohim 1 year ago 12
and the score is
Linux: 5,000,000
Free BSD: 5,000,000
Windows: -65
Tununias 1 year ago 4