WTC1 collapse initiation - visible signs

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,109
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 26, 2010

Self-proclaimed debunkers at the JREF forum say: It is theoretically possible that the towers collapsed due to airplane damage and fire. Therefore it doesn't matter why and how they actually collapsed.
I replied, it would be nice to investigate even the murder of a cancer patient.

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MegaYeshua33 No, the fact that the antenna is falling so soon means all the central columns failed at once. This was the point of the video

  • @turbodude555 I believe the antenna falling is important to this to, cause the antenna does fall before the outer columns start to break, witch would help solve what is causing this air pressure release. Plus the outer columns have started to break before this anyway. It is easy to see in the video. The description in the video is wrong.

  • I think the most important thing here is the antenna started falling FIRST. This was mounted to the main support pillars!! IE the main support pillars all spontaneously went at the very same time BEFORE the main collapse.

    Airgo: INSIDE JOB!

  • @TheMKMonarch

    Indeed, caused by bombs offcourse.

    Come on.. Why do people still believe the US government actually says the truth? After things in the past..Like Vietnam, and some wars to bring 'democracy' to those countries, while it actually was to get their oil.

  • u NEED MORE VIEWS

  • My Occam's Razor response: It was a controlled explosion to bring the tower down instead of having it tilt and bury even more buildings underneath it. It was not published for two reason: First, obviously, to avoid insurance claims and claims from people killed inside.

    The second one is more interesting, and the question that should be asked actually: Why were there explosives in the building in the first place? Is that some kind of standard now, hmm? "Just in case"?

  • @TheMKMonarch

    with your closed perhaps, look again watch?v=15VUbP16XpI&feature=re­lated at around 0:21 secs, before the detonation, a cylinder shaped object pierced all the way trough....its there, no point in been in denial.

  • @EasternGateGuardian

    No missile, no plane nose. Just smoke, fire and debris.

  • no investigation as to why a plane is seen going in the tower, then a missile head coming from the other side prior to detonation

    ''plane in, missile out''

  • Uh...the video is a simulation anyway. Both camps are dupes.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more