not only that , but there is more to it as well, i believe it was also Grant's part in it as well, with all of the information he got from canada, that was benifical to the yanks, there is a journal that explains the whole thing, what did what whos to blame, etc, etc, etc. that brings up the world we live in now, it is all controlled.
@egosdark003 The only reason the USA cared was the loss in tax revenue from the south. Lincoln was banking on that money for his term. The whole war was fought over "internal improvements" and resulted in the destruction of what used to be an EU style union and conversion into a single nation or Empire however you want to look at it. The states are countries just suppressed by the Feds. Like if the EU members were forced to give up their nationhood and sovereignty to form one big nation.
internationaly the csa was considered a nation. trade rights with france spain brazil/portugal were granted. the union simply had the largest army in the world at the time and was a major industrial power and would cause major inblance with other nations/ might have even started a earlyer world war. thats why none were able to aid. poland also had a uprising of the home guard in 1863 from it occupiers austria prussia & russia but was suppressed just like the south.
Wow....really. The fact that no other country officially recognized the South means that in the eyes of the international community the CSA was not an independent country. Therefore, being that they were not recognized as an independent country, how can the war be anything but a Civil War?
the definition says it all .faction or regions of the same country.did the south secede by constitutional amendment?was it a supreme court decision?what was the proccess ? i am sure you know . it sure wasnt soverign.before the civil war.
"this is only among the many proofs I had witnessed of the fact, that the prejudice of color is not nearly so strong in the South as in the North. In the south it is not at all uncommon to see black slaves of both sexes shake hands with white people when they meet, and interchange friendly personal inquiries: but at the North I do not remember to have witnessed this once: and neither in Boston, New York, or Philadelphia would
Okay, so the CSA stole land from the USA, how is this not a good reason to declare war?
Madpolis7 2 months ago
not only that , but there is more to it as well, i believe it was also Grant's part in it as well, with all of the information he got from canada, that was benifical to the yanks, there is a journal that explains the whole thing, what did what whos to blame, etc, etc, etc. that brings up the world we live in now, it is all controlled.
UScalvery 4 months ago
@Luigi84289 That's what state's rights means. The nationhood of all the states, their Sovereignty.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@egosdark003 The only reason the USA cared was the loss in tax revenue from the south. Lincoln was banking on that money for his term. The whole war was fought over "internal improvements" and resulted in the destruction of what used to be an EU style union and conversion into a single nation or Empire however you want to look at it. The states are countries just suppressed by the Feds. Like if the EU members were forced to give up their nationhood and sovereignty to form one big nation.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
internationaly the csa was considered a nation. trade rights with france spain brazil/portugal were granted. the union simply had the largest army in the world at the time and was a major industrial power and would cause major inblance with other nations/ might have even started a earlyer world war. thats why none were able to aid. poland also had a uprising of the home guard in 1863 from it occupiers austria prussia & russia but was suppressed just like the south.
egosdark003 1 year ago
Wow....really. The fact that no other country officially recognized the South means that in the eyes of the international community the CSA was not an independent country. Therefore, being that they were not recognized as an independent country, how can the war be anything but a Civil War?
wstuchell 2 years ago
the definition says it all .faction or regions of the same country.did the south secede by constitutional amendment?was it a supreme court decision?what was the proccess ? i am sure you know . it sure wasnt soverign.before the civil war.
stealthgerm 2 years ago
Why did my comment get a thumbs down? That guy said that and it's the truth.
Luigi84289 2 years ago
white persons generally like to be seen shaking hands and talking familiarly with blacks in the streets." - James S Buckingham English abolitionist
Luigi84289 2 years ago
"this is only among the many proofs I had witnessed of the fact, that the prejudice of color is not nearly so strong in the South as in the North. In the south it is not at all uncommon to see black slaves of both sexes shake hands with white people when they meet, and interchange friendly personal inquiries: but at the North I do not remember to have witnessed this once: and neither in Boston, New York, or Philadelphia would
Luigi84289 2 years ago