Dimarzio X2n in depth sound test

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21,177
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2008

this is another vid of the X2N...tryed to make it a lil more in depth including series/parallel switching as well

plz excuse my mediocre playing

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 19 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TFKofBD)

  • Excellent vid! I really wanna use this pup in the bridge position of a custom guitar with humbucker-single-humbucker. In the middle, I wanna put the FS-1 in the middle position, and a clean, warm pup (like the Humbucker from hell) in the neck. Any recommendations? And what type of tone pot would best complement these pups?

    Thanks for the advice, and keep up the awesome work ^_^

  • @MegashadX Thanks a lot for the appreciation bro. Moving on to your question, I really like your pickup choices but i would target for a slightly brighter pickup in the middle and a slightly darker one in the neck. The FS-1 is a good pickup but as I have not personally used it, i cannot say much. I did however, use the dimarzio Area 58's in conjunction with an X2N. They sound magical when they are mixed. Just dont buy the hype of ppl saying that you shouldnt match hot pickups with cool ones.

  • Nice vid! however i was wondering which of the following would be best for high gain riffing and soloing :

    Dimarzio X2N and PAF pro

    EMG 81/60

    Seymour duncan JB and Jazz

    Any opinions?

  • I dont know much about Actives so there is no opinion about the EMG's. But I would steer clear from the JB if you dont bend too much and dont pinch a lot :P

    Just my opinion. I know this can vary

Top Comments

  • Says another filipino dumbass that is probably using a PC ina cyber cafe with his monthly allowance.

  • don't need to bee "tinkering type" to bluid a active EQ... you just have to know what you are doing (i'm not, never build a piece of circuit EVER)

    but i don't want a active system on my guitar, i like all passive, because my guitar it's incredible well build, nice wood, excelent hardware and tuning, so ... i will NEVER put an active circuit on it...

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (104)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • SATANIC GUITAR!!!!!!!!! WOOW 

  • @metallica5252 Yeah, dude, got it. It's been nearly a year since I posted those stupid comments. I know it can get good cleans.

  • @CyValkarion dude no...x2n are perfectly fine with clean sounds as long as you are able to split the coil. I have mine on my RG with a 5 way switch and whenever I split the coil the clean sound is amazing.

  • @ExplodeEd 85/60 emg...for real...85 is great in the bridge. 60 is great for the neck.If you want Duncans, I would go with a Custom Custom (B) and a 59 in the neck. If you want really good active, Blackouts are much better than EMGS, but thats only my opinion.

  • @CyValkarion It's not a B.C. Rich. Your argument is invalid.

  • @TFKofBD man nice videos and playing etc thanks. Let me ask you i got the Ibanez 170DX . You said that tapping " gets easier " with this Pickup X2n right? I should buy one?

  • If that's a B.C. Rich, this demo is invalid... This wasn't all that "In depth" either. YOu didn't show it to use with the guitar volume rolled back on each channel... Anyways, the X2N is NOT for clean sounds. It's fantastic for balls out distortion, but otherwise it's a pretty limited pickup. I wouldn't have very many applications for this pup. Personally the hottest pickup I would use is a D Activator. The Super Distortion is perfect, IMO.

  • Nice rc planes you've got back there !

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more