Richard Dawkins admits good case for God exists atheists shocked.

Please rate and comment as you see fit.
The article mentioned in the video.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/2543431/is-richard-dawkins-still-e...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• his
• darwin
• debate
• richard
• she
• loves
• you
• does
• wants
• once
• said
• time
• again
• could
• mean
• wish
• upon
• had
• wait
• well
• good
• minute
• smile
• bad
• bleed
• doesn
• matter
• lifetime
• dream
• december
• smart
• phones
• repair
• wireless
• video
• review
• technology
• mobile
• electronics
• computers
• cellphones
• medicine
• environment
• nokia
• tips
• tricks
• software

[GuineaPigDan]

For anyone interested, here's a clip from the debate ShockofGod is reffering to. Right after Dawkins says that one could argue for a deistic god, he says it's "not a case I would accept." Skip to the 3 minute mark for full context.

watch?v=DxD-HPMpTto

Dawkins himself has also responded to the people who have quote mined him.

watch?v=24vWUeMnXBg

[disrxt]

Dawkins says a deistic God could exist and this piece of shit thinks it means his asshole Jesus is real. What a liar and moron Shockofshite is. Fuck Jesus and the cross they hung him on.

Any honest atheist will have to admit that a God could exist. What can be proved is that specific gods do not exist. Especially the cruel, capricious prick in the Bible.

[abhishikt]

This is quote mining done by John Lennox - watch?v=24vWUeMnXBg where Dawkins ridicules him.

[TheHogTieChamp]

When was the last time shock repeated this lie? Yesterday.

Seriously, at least once each week in his chatroom, shock repeats this quote-mine, "... a serious case for deism could be made...," then concludes that atheists are panicked and that Christ is Lord.

Often, a helpful person will add to the chat the words that shock is skipping over as he reads the "article" (blog post).

Banning results, of course.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

[flynbryan41]

"its over atheists"  haha you moron

[necr0sys]

@disrxt lol Exactly what I thought. Nothing to back you claims up. You are making the claim, you must back it up. Simple as that.

[disrxt]

@necr0sys My sources? The Bible itself and history books. Are you that poor a Christian you need me to quote you chapter and verse on the genealogies of Jesus or the historical persons mentioned in Luke? Are incapable of doing a web search on famous historical personalities to find their birth and death dates? You don't want sources, you want to remain ignorant. I'm content to let you stay that way.

[necr0sys]

@disrxt My big mouth is going to say, what is your source??

[disrxt]

@necr0sys Pay attention asshole, you ain't gonna like this. There are two genealogies for Jesus, between David and Joseph they don't match on a single ancestor. One numbers 17 generations the other 41. Luke says Herod was King and Quirinius was Governor of Syria when Jesus was born. Herod died in 6 BCE and Quirinius became Governor in Syria in 4 CE, a 10 year differences sweet cheeks. What your big mouth got to say now? I got plenty more, but only 500 characters. All in needed to pwn you.

[necr0sys]

@GuineaPigDan Yes they are. You know what, there is a serious case for you argument GuineaPigDan, but it's not a case I PERSONALLY would accept. See what I did there? I just gave your argument credibility and weight by saying the exact same thing as Richard Dawkings

[necr0sys]

@disrxt lol people like you make me laugh. Show me historical error and so called self contradiction numbnuts

[disrxt]

@necr0sys You don't know what you're talking about. I see no evidence of or need for gods. that statement does not preclude the existance of gods. I can show you historical error, self contradiction and evil in the Bible that proves that particular mythis a lie. Now tell me how do you think this shows I am not honest? Put up or shut the fuck up. All your statement proves is you are either dishonest or a fool, propably both.