Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Global Warming SCAM! (An Inconvenient Truth)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
809,825
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 20, 2007

http://www.justa11en.com
I hope to inspire people to do their own research, search out their own answers, & get out of the habit of accepting what they have been told (or seen on TV) as fact.
I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE OPPOSING OPINIONS, & THEORIES ON THIS SUBJECT.
THAT IS THE MOTIVATION FOR THIS VIDEO.
FTR I'm a registered Independent, and I drive a Prius.
Thank you for your time.
RECENT admissions by IPCC:
http://tinyurl.com/3xangr

Another broken brick in the wall:
http://tinyurl.com/8p7d83

Links mentioned in the video:
One of the latest, in which a judge ruled that the film contains SERIOUS SCIENTIFIC INACCURACIES, POLITICAL PROPAGANDA, and may only be shown in schools with a discalaimer.
http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6489187.html
A fan of "an inconvenient truth"
Gary's (anakin1814) excellent vid on the movie,
Al Gore, & the subject in general:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-tT6XSlFpo

Some other, global warming ralated, random links:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070315101129.htm

http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaruherald/4064691a6571.html

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20070319.DCM015&show_article=1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_...

MY "space monkey" video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbaVQeD3Wc8

MY "upsetting" video that is referenced:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LGqhMVQ1dQ

I may add others, but I encourage YOU to seek out your own information.

  • likes, 2,020 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (55,573)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These are some of the same scare tactic liberals that claimed we were headed for a new ice-age in the 70's. Global Warming is a SCARE TACTIC.

    PEOPLE: The IPCC (lead group on which the entire global warming "study" was based on) was a completely biased group who augmented their research to fit their theory. The lead researcher even admitted to making false statements which completely invalidates the study (for those that understand true research).

  • @23peaceToady "Measurements done at the Dombaas research center in two periods: 1940-1946 and 1978-1994. As can be seen, the ozone layer went through a thinning process in the 1940s similar to that occurring now, with the exception, as noted by Henriksen, that "the ozone layer over southern Norway was thinner in the period between 1940 to 1946 than it is today." Henriksen also points out that the level of ultraviolet (UV) radiation have hardly changed:"

    .

    Legs drying yet hippie chick?

  • "Satellite radar altimetry measurements indicate that the East Antarctic ice-sheet interior north of 81.6°S increased in mass by 45 ± 7 billion metric tons per year from 1992 to 2003. Comparisons with contemporaneous meteorological model snowfall estimates suggest that the gain in mass was associated with increased precipitation. A gain of this magnitude is enough to slow sea-level rise by 0.12 ± 0.02 millimeters per year."

  • @PrairLeDogged Comment troll, your denier games are old, get some new material.

    By the way, the climate is still warming globally

    And the great thing about science is that it's true, whether you believe it or not ;)

  • @Nightversion'n'

    Cloner and cyber-bully it does not matter if you spam off all of my comments everywher I post as I shall just leave MORE !!!

    I have just as much right to be here as you and I will not be bullied off these pages as you've been trying to do for years and years.

    You need a lesson in human rights and look up the right to free speech.

  • @23peacefrog

    RE: 'How much extra CO2 in the atmosphere is needed to warm the Earth? Figures please!'

    It is much less than you can imagine.

    The climate has several main components: temp, humidity, atm.pressure, wind, rainfall. The weather is the current value of these components.

    Climate has also several cycles-carbon cycle (part.); water cycle, energy cycles -solar (heat, photosynthesis, etc.); kinetic (wind, thunders, ocean waves, etc.)

    You do not need too much energy to damage the equilibrium.

  • @PrairLeDogged Wow, I love how your idiot imbecile sock puppets suddenly post idiotic comments all over climate change videos at the same time.

    How many denier sock puppets do you have? Why do you post them all at the same time?

    Why are you so obvious?

    Duh?

  • ..cont

    "He said: "We've got the ideal location for wind power but unfortunately seagulls kept flying into it.

    "We were told by the manufacturer to expect maybe one fatality a year but it killed 14 in six months so we took advice and made the decision to turn it off.

    "If it had happened at night time you could understand that the birds couldn't see the blades, which rotate at 135mph but it was happening at all different times of the day."

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more