WEARECHANGE COLORADO - OFFICIAL MURDER STATEMENT.
Uploader Comments (911TRUTHINATOR)
Top Comments
-
And they call us, sheeple.
-
The irony is, people who DONT believe there was a massive government conspiracy are labelled as sheeple, when in reality its the muppets that swallow everything loose change says that need to wake up. Anyone who believes that the evil bush was involved with this is as daft as he is. He cant tie his own shoes.....
All Comments (30)
-
Why do they call them sheep? it makes no sense, i dont get it?!
-
"Because if you cant prove who, what, when, where and HOW, then you dont KNOW a blue screen was used. youd just be guessing."
watch?v=6pGD6U004fA
-the who, what, etc.
you can't complain that this video is not an "academic source" when you used another utube video in trying to refute the notion that footage was faked. you can either refute the claims made in "bluescreen assassins" or in other videos that prove footage was faked, or you can pathetically howl about your standards.
-
JasQaeda "if bluescreen was used, i don't need to know""
Yes you DO need to know. Because if you cant prove who, what, when, where and HOW, then you dont KNOW a blue screen was used. youd just be guessing.
Come on Achmed. Youll need to do better that this if you want the 72 virgins.
And tell me again how if I see Jesus in a burrito, it must REALLY be true, just because it looks like it.
Ive always loved that one.
-
"If its not a lie, youd be able to submit proof of exactly who, what, when, where..."
if bluescreen was used, i don't need to know WHO used it to know that it was in fact used.
"Youve been smashed so many times on it, you know youre lying."
what kind of a "smashing" results in you blocking me? answer: a delusional one.
look up "bluescreen assassins" for your "who, what, when, where and how it was produced." i forgot: YT vids are not "academic sources."
your excuses are pathetic.
-
watch?v=44cFTrfjIfM
is this video a valid, academic source?
(make sure you see the video before making a judgment on it.)
-
watch?v=44cFTrfjIfM
is this a valid source?
-
"If its not a lie, youd be able to submit proof of exactly who, what, when, where..."
if bluescreen was used, i don't need to know WHO used it to know that it was in fact used.
"Youve been smashed so many times on it, you know youre lying."
what kind of a "smashing" results in you blocking me? answer: a delusional one.
look up "bluescreen assassins" for your "who, what, when, where and how it was produced." i forgot: YT vids are not "academic sources."
your excuses are pathetic.
-
he notion that footage was doctored on 911 is not a lie.""
sure it is. Youve been smashed so many times on it, you know youre lying.
If its not a lie, youd be able to submit proof of exactly who, what, when, where and how it was produced.
Achmed, answer the question. Why do you lie? What do YOU get out of it?
-
watch?v=wpkqomUc7Xs
something to think about
You interviewed nathan too?
dsglop 3 years ago
lol.
911TRUTHINATOR 3 years ago