Ben's Police Project. Let's read the whole defence.

http://www.benlowrey.com creditors in commerce winston shrout jack smith gordon hall brandon adams robert menard accepted for value A4v john harris commercial redemption free man on the land ben lowrey bashar john demartini zeitgeist fractional reserve money debt fiat alex jones prison planet info wars project camelot TPUC Tim Turner Sam Davis Douglas Riddle Vince Kahn cveitch charlie veitch divine natural positive canon veronica chapman sovereign republic self determination dean clifford

Category:

Education

Tags:

• http://www.benlowrey.com
• creditors
• in
• commerce
• winston
• shrout
• jack
• smith
• gordon
• hall
• brandon
• adams
• robert
• menard
• accepted
• for
• value
• A4v
• john
• harris
• commercial
• redemption
• free
• man
• on
• the
• land
• ben
• lowrey
• bashar
• demartini
• zeitgeist
• fractional
• reserve
• money
• debt
• fiat
• alex
• jones
• prison
• planet
• info
• wars
• project
• camelot
• TPUC
• Tim
• Turner
• Sam
• Davis
• Douglas
• Riddle
• Vince
• Kahn
• cveitch
• charlie
• veitch
• divine
• natural
• positive
• canon
• veronica
• chapman
• sovereign
• republic
• self
• determination
• dean
• clifford

[dejorn]

at approximately 16:30AM ????? Did she not proof read before she sent it? Seems that she also has trouble reading as she is claiming you are claiming some things that you just haven't claimed.

[abedanger]

1:52 "notwithstanding" [<One's capacity, status or standing]

AVER. In pleading. To declare or assert; to set out distinctly and formally; to allege.

Black's 1st

ADMIT. To allow, receive, or take; to suffer one to enter; to give possession; to license. [also see ADMISSION; ADMISSIONS]

Black's 3rd

It would seem the respondent(s) presumes you have no standing and that you're an "affiliate" of the COMPANY/STATE.

[shekkyshabazz]

Make sure you rebut where they say it's the law, or you agree that it is. It looks like they are saying it in passing, but you need to rebut that too.

[mrichards55]

The Defendant's scant summary of the Particulars of your Claim is impoverished.

[Disterbed1199]

all that they say is still under their statutes and acts ,so where is your contract with them ,if you are not in contract you are not obligated to their statutes or code ,acts ...under the constitution you may freely travel the lands god put forth.with any conveyance at hand.

[Danster82]

Im not sure if its best to respond to all their points as each point being a claim ignoring the more fundmental claim of jurisdiction, keep it simple and stick to the fundmental point dont let them trick you into walking the Via Dolorosa.

I like the "claimaint admits to the offence of having an uninsured motor"

no

"claimaint admits to having an uninsured motor"

[Danster82]

I guess that could be a simple question to put to the court or defendant, did you attempt to address the critial issue of jurisidction in your defence?

Clearly not.

[61shirley]

Legal Services Department? Wheres the Lawful Services Department

[alex121207]

I know your testing waters ben and i do hope you get what your looking for with this. I personally think though that you have played straight in their hands on this one. iIt seems that your Arguing and i think you should not have used their paperwork. I May be wrong. I,m not saying i know it all. Good luck with this.

[anafael1]

Computer says no...