Exposing DaMagiCraven

YouTube "Christian," DaMagiCraven has posted a video he calls the "Stupidest Atheist Moments on YouTube," in which he presumes to identify 10 such moments and, presumably, evaluate all atheists by the actions of a few.

As it turns out, no one can argue that some of the items listed are stupid, but they are, by no means, the kinds of things only atheists tend to be found doing.

And of the ten, one item, at least, did not occur on YouTube.

In any case, this is another religionist who tends to indulge in fallacious and irrelevant argumentation. A check of other videos bears this out.

I challenged a few of the statements that were made by DaMagiCraven. Several comments needed to be approved.

They weren't.

One that was actually published saw me challenge his claim about evolution. Craven responded by reasserting his misdefinition, refusing to debate, and blocking me from further comment.

Okay...if I can't comment there, I'll comment, here, and post a few more videos exposing his poor arguments.

The video to which this video is a specific response can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82jTUEDFzVg

The comments about evolution can be found in the comment section of this video, for the time being, at least:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlR0sWrkuxQ

As always, comments from those not in my friends list require approval. All comments that are constructive will be approved, regardless of the position taken. All friends comments are automatically approved. All comments must address the substance of the video or they will be disallowed. Comment voting is disabled. The policy prevents spamming, and disabling comment voting keeps substantive comments from being "spammed out" just because some group or person or another doesn't like them.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• DaMagiCraven
• Brett Keane Strikes Back
• fallacious arguments
• logical fallacies

[Vilemk0]

Also, you shouldn't have your comments set to approve only if you're going to complain about freedom of comment/speech on youtube fyi. >_< 1:35 (for reference.) 

[nascentatheist]

@Vilemk0 - The explanation for this is already provided and this particular video is actually not a bad example, since Craven has attempted to spam it several times using sock-puppets. The approval process is used to ensure that discussions stay on topic. Craven's is to squelch any opposition to his position - any at all. Those are two different standards.

[Vilemk0]

@nascentatheist I understand, I was simply pointing out how others might see this conflicting action. Even if you do explain it, it's still youtube comments. You can always scan through and remove comments that are vulgar and off subject.

[nascentatheist]

@Vilemk0 - Sure, but I don't really want to spend time cleaning out spam. I don't worry too much about how it's viewed by others. Even if there's a question, if I answer it and it's all good with that other person, it's cool. If not, that's cool, too. ;)

[nascentatheist]

Craven is a serious idiot. I just looked at one of his presumed "rebuttals" to Thunderf00t, in which he takes T-f00t to task for his criticism of VenomFangX's claims about the formation of the Grand Canyon. He accuses T-f00t of nit-picking, based on his own rather peculiar interpretation of the comments of both T-f00t and Shawn. I'll be exposing him on that score, next.

[Vilemk0]

@nascentatheist I understand.

[ChuckyJesus666]

@nascentatheist Well, somebody needs to keep them honest....wait....they're not honest to start with!

[nascentatheist]

@ChuckyJesus666 - Just FYI, this comment duped for some reason, so I removed the dupe. ;) And I do understand what you're saying. As a teacher, I work on that very thing.

[nascentatheist]

@ChuckyJesus666 - I was willing to give the guy a chance. But after viewing about half a dozen videos and then getting the response that I did, well, it's clear that he's just another ignorant, arrogant, cowardly religionist.

[ChuckyJesus666]

Well, regarding DaMagiCraven's behavior -- what do you expect from a pig, but a grunt?