Maddow on Citizens United v. FEC
Loading...
Top Comments
All Comments (32)
-
@nathanlabish FUCK you. that is all.
-
The governments rights stop when abridging free speech is involved. Thank god the supreme court has read the constitution, I would suggest you do the same.
-
@nathanlabish The corporations' rights stops where the public's rights begin, which is why the court's ruling is wrong.
-
This argument is manufactured left wing authoritarian propaganda. Read the 1st amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,..." The debate was not if a corporation is a person, but if congress could make a law abridging free speech. When you start with the premise that the government gives you free speech you are in a very dangerous place.
-
"will healthcare reform be the first tragedy?"
oh how correct you are... how correct you are.
-
They do much more then give TV ads, they have to travel, do rallies, give out flyers, get their word out in any way possible. That all requires massive amounts of money and it does make a big difference.
-
@liberalmike1994 I don't think there is much of a correlation between amount of advertising and success in elections. Voters usually resonate more with the message than a candidate's exposure on TV.
9:48
Is It Just Corporate Free Speech?by LiberalViewer97,062 views- 2:33
Citizens United v. FEC - Supreme Court Rulingby ReelFactsProductions1,619 views
- 10:00
Red Eye Rips Media Matters, Maddow, and Olbermann!by olbywatch22,784 views
- 12:30
Leahy Comments On The Citizen's United Supreme Court Decisionby SenatorPatrickLeahy1,649 views
- 8:19
Rachel Maddow Show: (R) hypocracy on stimulus moneyby DistressedLiberal2,348 views
- 4:18
Citizens United v. FEC Summaryby JBMCompany994 views
- 0:31
Keep Foreign Money Out of American Politicsby BobFertik8,092 views
- 10:35
Citizens United v FEC Part 1 Clements & Amicus Briefby martha040321,165 views
- 2:30
Dangerous Supreme Court Rulingby mds123069518 views
- 2:17
Attempted Citizen's Arrest Of Karl Roveby ThePatriotsMaxims93,660 views
- 2:33
Hayward on Citizens Unitedby allisonhayward4,274 views
- 4:25
FreeSpeechForPeople.orgby freespeechpeople30,575 views
- 3:14
3 Reasons Not To Sweat The "Citizens United" SCOTUS Rulingby ReasonTV41,465 views
- 10:57
A First Amendment Analysis of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - Part 2 of 3by infoRipple430 views
- 0:29
John McCain - Surprizingly Liberalby IntrinsicValue19481,619 views
- 3:06
"Pres Obama Corporations are NOT people" 96 year old Sidney Gluck on CITIZEN'S UNITED! 2/10/10by Schlockumentaries2,163 views
- 1:06
Senator Feingold responds to SCOTUS Citizens United Vs. FEC Rulingby katierosenberg29373 views
- 7:55
"Are Corporations People?": Larry Lessig on Campaign Finance Reformby ChangeYourCongress7,963 views
- 9:20
The 2010 Campaign after the Court's "Citizens United" Decisionby PollsAndVotes361 views
- 0:39
Citizens United v Federal Elections Commissionby jonaszajac282 views
If corporations are "people" then are they not also subject to the responsibilities as well as the rights of individuals--in other words, if a corporation's is found to have cut corners in producing a product, and this leads to a death, who will serve the sentence for involuntary manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide? The CEO? The entire board?
hatemorethanyou999 8 months ago 3
I would be fine with corporations staying out of politics, if Rachael Maddow and her ilk in the media would stay out of politics.
Corporate bought adds are a drop in the bucket compared to liberal bias of media workers.
Go to a communications class at a university and take a poll. They are 99% liberal. I have seen it in a lecture hall with 500 students, "All those voting democrat raise your hand."
tnekkc 1 month ago