Pentagon Aircraft Impact Simulation

Simulation of an aircraft hitting The Pentagon. This was made by Purdue University, and the first time I saw it the commentators were talking about 911...in this version they minimize that aspect and talk about software development.

The video clearly shows that there is very little chance an aircraft this size hit the building at all. It just couldn't have done so little damage while leaving so little DEBRIS.

Crazy.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• pentagonVis2003.mpg
• pentagon
• attack
• simulation
• 911
• 9/11
• proof
• plane
• crash
• jet

[kinaydjin]

In response to most of the commenters:

That day, for the first time in recorded history, two jet aircraft vaporised on impact...one with the ground in Virginia, the other at the Pentagon.

The wall is there, look more carefully at the simulation. The question you should ask is why didn't the fully fueled wings leave any *fuel* outside the walls.

The original version of the video did, indeed, talk about 9/11. They changed it to discuss their software, very likely under some kind of pressure.

[BettieRazorblade]

this video pretends the concrete wall wasnt there in an attempt to hide the fact that the wings would have snapped off and remained outside the building

[kinaydjin]

Actually, this video SHOWS how much visible damage should have remained after the crash.

I think Purdue must've been squeezed, because I recall a different video with commentary using this simulation where the whole idea was to disprove the administrations claim it was any kind of passenger liner that hit the pentagon.

[MrDuspaghi]

somebody forgot to explain the exit hole after three buildings, but somebody remembered to make the enginees disappear on the simulation.

[croeagle100]

thank you God that most of the people are not stupid.

[AlmightyJerk]

@PantzMaster76 It's not so much of what, it would look like. But the fact that it, isn't there at all.

[AlmightyJerk]

Well, there's the proof it wasn't a plane.

[Airportchris2]

@PantzMaster76 Ummm, common sense?

[koford]

@PantzMaster76 Of course u do except heavily damage from those two engine wouldn't you? And this simulate doesn't show *any* engine damage.

[PantzMaster76]

@Airportchris2 How do you know what the damage would look like?