debunking Atlas of creationism's attempts on science #1

EDIT: I attached this as a reply to that boor, simply because it, and in fact the series that sprang from it, is evidence enough to prove that he is full of shit.

no, we aren't all "ants" "barbarians", and what not. and not all of us keep quiet at the depredations of a few fundementalists, unlike what you claim. thunderf00t, you sicken me, and bring shame on all my Atheist friends, from theproff1988 to maxwolf. I'm ashamed that they will be associated with the likes of you, after all that you have said. same applies to Pat Condell btw, and I am considering a video on him atm.

the offending article: http://us1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/13658/THE_DECEPTION_THAT_...


Ann Gibbon's entry in science: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/274/5288/720?ck=nck (Ann Gibbons Article)

basics on Alan Feduccia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Feduccia

time periods, and subperiods of the mesozoic: http://www.dinodata.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=53&...

where I got that nifty graph: http://palaeo-electronica.org/1999_2/gigan/refer.htm (I had a compy of one of the referenced sources)

all material here is under fair use coment and criticism clause, or for creative license (on demotvationals).

what a hypocrite Yahya is...

PS: any commenters that go too far will be given a warning.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• science
• creationism
• Harun
• Yahya
• unislamic
• man
• hypocrite
• assclown

[wolfwing1]

also if it's the quotes I'm thinking about isn't the quotes from the guy saying he was against birds coming from dinosaurs at the beginning or before we started to get most of the new feathered dinosaurs and dinosaur like birds since around 2001, and he's since accepted it more?

[Albukhshi]

@wolfwing1

if you mean to ask about Feduccia, then I am not sure; I do know that yahya quotes an outdated, and completely invalidated article by the Professor.

If you mean yahya, no, he has not changed.

[wolfwing1]

@Albukhshi Feduccia I meant, they take a quote from a time when only 1-2 fossils not archeoraptyryx was found and claim it's taken to mean now. Heh.

A great book I read on the subject was how to build a dinosaur, it talks about the claims by Yahya and others, B-rex is the same one they jumped on saying that it had soft tissue. The gene part, and calcium formations in the bones are far more compelling since both are close to birds. So might be why he said they think they are ancestors.

[Albukhshi]

@wolfwing1

ah, I see now where you are going.

but no, the B-rex is not the reason Harun thinks paleontologists theorize birds came from T-rex; in fact, he KNOWS that's not true-otherwise, he would've mentioned the medullary bones in the article I dealt with (which he did not). In fact, I doubt he even knows anything about B-rex, beyond what popular tabloids have to say-if even that.

but yeah, Horner's Book on dinobuilding was awesomez.

[Kattarina98]

I hate this guy especially for wanting to drag the Muslims back to the Middle Ages - when it was Muslim science who helped the West to leave the Middle Ages behind.

[Albukhshi]

that's why I make these-to warn the world about him, as other hae about VFX, NF, and others.

[wolfwing1]

heh I think he's mistaking stuff about B-rex wich proved that t-rex and likly other dinosaurs simular to it like raptors and such had many bird like features, such as calcium buildup when about to lay eggs *B-rex was pregnant at the time of death* the fact caligen*sp and think thats it* Genes in the t-rex were more simular to modern birds then modern reptiles showing that birds likly had a common ancestor closer to a T-rex then a alligator or such.

[Albukhshi]

indeed.

then again, he relies on dazzling his victims with eye candy and "good presentation"

[TheProf1988]

I have an atlas of creation! what a piece of shit book that is. good pictures though...

[Rapator2]

Great