Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing

The best part of Neals' theory, i think,
is how the prime matter particles, are
attracted to, and glom on to, the positron, in layers, shielding it,
but not to the electron.
This must mean that prime matter has a slight negative charge.
(but much less than an electron)

BTW happy new-year, everyone!

GENTS, Let me say this.
When a high-energy AMOUNT Photon STRIKES a STILL field,..JUST RIGHT. IT adds HALF it's energy to each HALF of the field. THIS is how we get MATTER.
MATTER, therefore IS 1/2 EM field with !/2 (high-energy Photon ADDED.
These TWO HALVES though they FIRE away REMAIN one whole field, though the HALVES are stretched out for BILLIONS OF MILES.
THIS is ALL that ALL MATTER IS! That's IT.
For BULK/FILL of Protons and Neutrons we have complete/un-split PM 'particles".

A wave is just a 2 dimensional cross section of a 3D vortex, as 2 dimensions, has no volume, it doesn't really exist in our 3 dimensioned universe,

So, perhaps, we should throw out the idea of the wave and replace it with the vortex. As a 2D wave does not show torsion, yet we live in a universe where EVERYTHING is spinning, and moving, nothing is at rest...

Perhaps, time is just our movement through space. If one could, actually, be still, in this universe, time stops, for them.

GMB - Good question about the medium. Another possibility worth considering is that the energy packets are actually at rest in the "natural" reference system, as are all "particles" (if you will, such as neutrinos) without mass. In that case, there need not be a medium. They move at the speed of light relative to _our_ gravitationally bound system, but that is _our_ movement, not theirs. Cheers!

GMB: There is only pure energy. There is nothing else. What is an electron made of? It can't be made of any matter substance because matter is a configuration of atoms. All the particles are made of pure energy. It is all energy.

The difference between a particle and free energy is that the energy of a particle is trapped into a non-dimensional point in space. But it is pure energy reflecting/waving into itself.

A free traveling wave is the highest state of pure energy.

"This is neither here nor there to growing earth theory."

It is EVERYTHING. Growing Earth is the clue and evidence for creation of matter. But it is of little consequence because it's too slow. But the physics... Oh, the physics!! When we discover th process and can duplicate it, we will discover an unimagined source of energy. We will understand and conquer gravity through it. We will traverse the solar system in a fraction of the time we do today.

"A wave is free waving energy. It is not merely an action. It is its own medium. "

No a wave is an action, through a medium. If you have to go well outside physics norms to try and figure out what that medium could even possibly be, well thats what you ought to do. If its a wave through basic plank-width particles of primary stuff, well I'm fine with that. But you don't have waves but that you have the wave and the medium.

GMB- When an energy wave is trapped in a non-dimensional point, it continues to wave in place, about itself, and becomes a particle. It needs no medium to do this as it needs no medium in its pure energy form. Energy must be able to exist independently without a medium. It creates a medium for the physical universe, but in its pure form, it is free and waves infinitely being its own medium..

You cannot have wave action in a non-dimensional point. I can see that you are forced to build on the mainstream for this side of the story. But this is dangerous. Because the mainstream builds its castles on air alone. In this case you are telling me there is a wave that is acting without any room to do so. But by its very definition a wave must have room to move.

We want to go more basic than mainstream physics. You are talking about pure energy. But energy only exists in context.

"Energy must be able to exist independently without a medium."

Why must it? It may seem that I'm pulling the proof bar higher than I would with the mainstream. But to me the mainstream needs a complete overhaul. Always we only see energy in context. Not divorced from matter. Hence we don't have much to work with when we start talking about "pure energy".