Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition Review (Part 1)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (546)
-
I am glad that they balanced the classes out a bit, for sake of freedom you can take since that point. Like in AD&D and D&D 3.5 Wizard was so overpowered that for many of things he had to pay with his xp and shitload of gold. Like death of a familiar - you loose like 2k xp and can't summon him for year and one day... creating a wand or potion costs you ass-load of xp hence there was no point in doing alchemy or any real magic crafting. 4th ed lets you to explore bit more the areas left obscure
-
jon stewart?
-
@paulnatcia I always thought it'd be cool if racial special abilities depended on your class.
Like, ie., if your a halfling rogue your race ability is that you're better at picking locks. Or if you're a halfling barbarian you have the 'fuck yo' critical' ability.
-
My main problem with 4e is that characters can, quite literally, become amazingly godly. I really like playing 4e at lower levels, but 3.5 is awesome any time. I really wish a single goblin could hit me in 4e... Anything with the D20 system is pretty awesome though.
-
FUCK YO CRITICAL!
-
Bipeedal? Come on Spoony.
-
DOVAKIN!!!
-
Did he just say that the Warlord is the 'fluffer'??
-
@unowhatireallysaid CHEERS! 1st Edition then, 1st Edition now, 1st Edition forever!
The 4ed is good for somethngs but they killed many terms, races and other specialities... for example: What Happened with Aasimar, dwarven/elven/gnome/halfing races? what happened with the Prestige Class Concept? Why did the mutliclass and hybrid class changed the ideas about them? What happened with Crafting and professions? Yes, I'm a rookie/amateur but I saw and read some books and i've some 3.5 and 4ed to compare and have my personal view. 4ed good in many things, 3.5 is a bit better ;)
paulnatcia 10 months ago 13
1st edition AD&D, period. Long live Gygax and Arneson!
unowhatireallysaid 5 months ago 2