@kenballer00 -- you may assume any the shit you pull out of your own ass tastes and smells lilke shit, which indeed it is. A will assume due to your lack of due diligence that you regretfully agree that i am right on all counts and you are wrong.
@kenballer00 -- you may assume any the shit you pull out of your own ass tastes and smells lilke shit, which indeed it is. A will assume due to your lack of due diligence that you regretfully agree that i am right on all counts and you are wrong.
i am going to assume that you concede my point and have researched my claims and found out that they are true and now have to resort to this in order to evade any further exposure to your positon that reeks with BS
haven't you looked up any of the supreme court cases i gave that specifically state that CIVIL marriage is indeed all about procreation according to the government's perspective. i suggest you do the research because i have also watched those trial briefings and they are inaccurate with what centuries worth of constitutional law. i could enlighten you myself if need be. care to challenge me
you don't have to call it a civil union socially or LEGALLY because we can always offer marriage recognition from canada
the U.S. supreme court has been consistent throughout the history of marriage from plural marriage( Murphy v. Ramsey), from interracial marriage (Loving v Virginia), to even gay marriage (Baker v. Nelson) that marriage is between a man and a woman and the purpose of it is to PROMOTE procreation into an environment where there is two biological married parents(on law books)
@kenballer00 1) why alloe civil unions & not marriage?--ans--predjudice rooted in a lack of insight. 2) nothing says marriage is for the raising of kids--marriage is for any darn couple of any advanced age, any race, and is a personal expression of freedom, commitment and a statement to the outside world. would you like to get civil unionized?
@kenballer00 -- you may assume any the shit you pull out of your own ass tastes and smells lilke shit, which indeed it is. A will assume due to your lack of due diligence that you regretfully agree that i am right on all counts and you are wrong.
jerrydoubleu 1 year ago
@kenballer00 -- you may assume any the shit you pull out of your own ass tastes and smells lilke shit, which indeed it is. A will assume due to your lack of due diligence that you regretfully agree that i am right on all counts and you are wrong.
jerrydoubleu 1 year ago
i am going to assume that you concede my point and have researched my claims and found out that they are true and now have to resort to this in order to evade any further exposure to your positon that reeks with BS
kenballer00 1 year ago
@kenballer00 -- ken ur one of those closeted guys aren't you. u ever got ur weenie suked by a gay guy? Ans: yah. And you fondled his tool in return.
jerrydoubleu 1 year ago
haven't you looked up any of the supreme court cases i gave that specifically state that CIVIL marriage is indeed all about procreation according to the government's perspective. i suggest you do the research because i have also watched those trial briefings and they are inaccurate with what centuries worth of constitutional law. i could enlighten you myself if need be. care to challenge me
kenballer00 1 year ago
@kenballer00 -- haven't you watched any of the post-trial briefings of Boies and Olson--marriage is not just @ procreation--u aren't correct in that.
jerrydoubleu 1 year ago
you don't have to call it a civil union socially or LEGALLY because we can always offer marriage recognition from canada
the U.S. supreme court has been consistent throughout the history of marriage from plural marriage( Murphy v. Ramsey), from interracial marriage (Loving v Virginia), to even gay marriage (Baker v. Nelson) that marriage is between a man and a woman and the purpose of it is to PROMOTE procreation into an environment where there is two biological married parents(on law books)
kenballer00 1 year ago
@kenballer00 1) why alloe civil unions & not marriage?--ans--predjudice rooted in a lack of insight. 2) nothing says marriage is for the raising of kids--marriage is for any darn couple of any advanced age, any race, and is a personal expression of freedom, commitment and a statement to the outside world. would you like to get civil unionized?
jerrydoubleu 1 year ago
how so?
kenballer00 1 year ago
@kenballer00 -- not true
jerrydoubleu 1 year ago