Imagine Spot 2
Top Comments
All Comments (570)
-
@amanda2324 You're getting into semantics here again. Nevertheless, I don't care what you consider are parts of a woman's body or not. The fact of the matter is, pregnancy affects a woman's life and health in huge ways. There's an increased risk of death with a load of other complications she'll have to deal with. A person is not obligated to risk their life and health like that for anyone and I'm very glad you don't get to choose whether a person has to put them self through that.
-
@amanda2324 No, I can see you have no idea what logic is because you can't tell the difference between logic and semantics. I doubt you're even in a position to say that you do know what logic is, because you do not have the knowledge to even be able to make that judgment. Nevertheless, whether people should be able to have health care on tax payer's money is a separate issue than the one I'm currently discussing.
-
@PureInertia "Thankfully, you don't get to decide what other people do with their bodies." This shows how unintelligent you are. The fetus is not a part of the woman's body and I have every say in whether an innocent human being can get murdered or not. I'm sorry you're so heartless that you think that it's okay to take another person's life and you find excuses why I shouldn't get a say in it, but frankly, I'm going to care about other people's right to life. I'm just like that.
-
@PureInertia 2. Yes, I do know what logic is. You're assuming I don't know. lol "The fact remains, women don't have to go through with pregnancies if they don't want to, for whatever reason, you don't want them to have that ability." Again, you fail to see reality for what it is. If they don't want to go through with the pregnancy, then they can end it themselves rather than waste my tax dollars putting to death an innocent human being.
-
@amanda2324 1. You assumed that, I didn't say that at all. Don't do that.
2. You don't even know what logic is! You're just delving into semantics now. This has nothing to do with logic. The fact remains, women don't have to go through with pregnancies if they don't want to, for whatever reason, you don't want them to have that ability. Thankfully, you don't get to decide what other people do with their bodies.
-
@PureInertia 1. No, but you implied that because they weren't men and women they were somehow not human.
2. LOL! You people who make such an argument really need to quit blinding your intelligence. Logically, and by the very definition of the word "force," we don't force women through pregnancy. Pregnancy will occur and continue whether we do something or not. Thus, logically, pregnancy can only be forced to stop. So your argument is illogical and flawed.
-
@amanda2324 1. I didn't say that already-born young people were men and women.
2. It's fine, we've found a way around the problems nature has handed us. If you don't like that it's fine. It's readily available for everyone. You appear to wish to take that away from us, thus forcing women to go through with pregnancies. You do not have that right.
-
@PureInertia The fact that fetuses are not men or women. Because neither are all of the already-born young people.
Then complain to nature, not to us. You'll just have to learn how to work with nature and deal with it like the rest of us.
Sorry, we don't force women through pregnancy. That's stupid to say. We can force a woman to cease a pregnancy by kill the baby, but we can't force a natural process to begin, nor force it to continue. By logical definition, of course.
Adoption is a beautiful thing. I plan on adopting children in the future. There is absolutely no reason to kill an unborn child when adoption is an option!
Vrijheidx 1 year ago 21
Let us pray for the soul of Steve Jobs!
petrosmedia 5 months ago 11