Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Evolution FALSIFIED! (...or not), with Ken Miller

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,416
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 29, 2009

excerpt from a very informative lecture from (theist - not that THAT should matter) biologist Ken Miller:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSg


posted in response to creationist drivel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xEkJpvjP1c


What is your explanation, creationists?

Why can't you propose an experiment/observation that would falsify the theory?

  • likes, 151 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (660)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why god and evolution is not mutualy exclusive. God apparently knows everything past and future. then he could have created everything the first day and let the rest going on as he knew it before he did it...

    "100% tetrapods" we are 100% tetrapods and 100% mammals but we are not 100% a cat or a dog??? Do you see where is the problem in all of your comments???

    You don't understand Evolution and how we explain Evolution.

  • ANYONE: If you see no reply to some of the posters below they know they are on ignore for things like name calling, personal insults & false accusations of lying. Some of them follow me (& others) around YT guard dogging evo vids with such tactics. If you feel a valid point was made & want to reiterate it, I will be very happy to reply. However, I only debate with the civil & objective.

  • @lugaidster Cont. "That's how evolution works. We only see the ones that lead us there." You're actually admitting that there is 0 evidence, 0 observable. Gazillionis of bacteria & algae & other mircro organisms are multiplying at lightning speed. How come they all stay bacteria & algae? How come uncounted billions,of fossils & innumerable life forms all around us show only 100% fish, 100% tetrapods, 100% mammals, 100% birds etc? Where are those fins-to- feet, scales-to-feathers etc?

  • @lugaidster ...harmful, but there is 0 evidence they cause any climb up the "Tree." When you are told that you get the usual evo spiel, which is always dataless inference presented as evidence. Look thru any evo site claiming to show evolution happened. If not right away, somewhere you will see the usual: "Millions of [untestable & unobservable] years ago...we infer...probably...likely...si­milarities...could have...must have..." Inference/speculation presented as fact is pseudo science.

  • @lugaidster ...is evolution, which is a major fallacy, then tell me why it is that you are different from your parents but you are both 100% homo sapiens? Yes, mutations do cause odd things like extra fingers. Notice that the creatures with the extra whatevers are still exactly the same species as before. Where are they seen climbing up that "Tree"? Give 1 example where mutations are seen to build up on one another in a systematic way. They happen. They're random. They're usually...

  • @lugaidster How is Down's Syndrome an example that support evolution? There are many oddities in nature, & D.S. is certainly a unique one. However evolution says that animals improve & start climbing up Darwin's Tree. D.S. does not cause an improvment, but the exact opposite. There are many mental & health disabilities associated with it. Further the children born with D.S. are still homo sapiens. Again, how is this an ex. of evolution? If you accept the definition that any change at all..

  • @LoricaLady And what about the people that have a trisomy? Ever heard of Down Syndrome? Thanks to the randomness introduced into every individual's genetic material due to the reproduction process, some are born with 6 fingers, two heads, three arms and and even one eye (amongst many other genetic differences). There's exceptions for everything, it disproves nothing.

    Some mutations are harmless and some other are harmful. That's how evolution works. We only see the ones that lead us here.

  • We don't have a God that attempts to deceive us. When you accept a lie as truth, and are confronted with truth, you don't want to receive it, or you choose to believe it is an attempt to deceive, it is not. The lie that you accepted first is the falsehood, it only appears to you that the truth is an attempt to deceive because you first erred.

  • @LoricaLady Just because you have a severe case of unwarranted self importance means nothing to anyone. You use more ad hominems to try to attack evolution even though the amount of evidence for it magnifies every year, and the amount of ID evidence dwindles. Just because you are to much of a child to accept your divine book means nothing in science. People like you are the sole reason for the U.S. slowly becoming a third world country.

  • ANYONE: If you see no reply to any posts made to me below, those people know they are on ignore for things like personal insults and name calling.. I would love to dispel disinformation about things I have said, & about what evolution says, but as they know I only debate with people who are being civil & objective. Personal invective & ad hominems are counterproductive to the true spirit and purposes of science.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more