How Do We Know that Christians Should Ignore GIIVideo?
Uploader Comments (telemantros)
Top Comments
-
his name isn't g2, its G I I, Which is an abriviation for god is imaginary
-
GIIvideo is wonderful
Video Responses
All Comments (184)
-
Your major premis is that god exists so therefore all your arguments are a falicy. If you got on youtube to debate G-2 that's sad becuase you don't even realize that their name is actually G-I-I as in God Is Immaginary...and you will never get a chance to debate them...they do not care about you or your very weak, double-speak baseless aruguments. Do you really belive in what you are saying or have you outgrown these silly view points...like any child out grows his love for superman?
-
Nice try, but none of your aruguments actually apply to any of G-I-I videos. You have prepared a lot of common philosopical axioms (do I smell someone took a first year philospy class?) and attmepted to overlay them on the points made by the video. Your only leverage is that video are about 10 minutes in length; given the time anyone could easily take apart your retorts very easily. You are trying to purport intellecualsim but sound like a prison lawyer trying to be an attorney.
-
At 1 minute, 49 seconds: "This is ???????" What word are you saying? (It sounds like "delicious?")
-
Just a note of correction: His name isn't "G Two Video." GII stands for "God Is Imaginary."
-
I have to say that although you put up a somewhat strong argument to back your case, it is not enough, because your main argument seems to be that giivideo cannot be trusted because they use science, reason, and logic (which are inherently and naturally on an atheistic plane) to back up their points, and you seem to have trouble with that fact because you yourself have a bias towards the supernatural, which goes completely against all scientific and logical basis' that have gotten us to where w
-
More evidence of why people laugh at Creationists
-
@telemantros I did not contradict myself you just don't understand what i'm saying, I meant most scientist are agnostic or atheist i never said they all believe in god you pointed that out and i agreed most people do believe just not everyone that is not my opinon that is a fact you mention the bible and your opinions in your videos and how you intrepid things so your the one with the contradictory.
You seem book smart but not very rational cuz your own personal beliefs most of science and historians are on the other side of this issue because of the of evidence which old Gospels are not btw and the term delsional was used correctly on the Giivideo which explains even smart people like this guy suffers from.
DB0175 1 year ago
@DB0175 This is very vague. So wherever the majority is, that's the right position? What's more, unless you have some argument you would like to supply on the overwhelming evidence of "the other side of the issue" this is an assertion. Lastly, if want to go buy the majority, the majority believe in God of some stripe.
telemantros 1 year ago
@telemantros exactly the majority do believe in god but not all just like most of scentist evidence it does'nt care how many people believe it is just there to exam and this is what most of sceince goes on. whats so vague about it?
DB0175 1 year ago
@DB0175 You are contradicting yourself, in your original post you said most science and historians are on the 'other side' and now you are saying that the majority do believe in God. What is vague is there are at least 5 different ways to use irrational, and more to the point, you simply assert without argument your opinions where I argued with arguments in video. Your posts are vague, assumptive, and contradictory.
telemantros 1 year ago
Being that there is absolutely no evident for a Christian, Jewish, Muslim God or any other God(s) aka Hindu etc. Or that any religious belief is real, I guess your reason for choosing Christianity is based on either your parents beliefs or that America is mostly Christian. Actually we need not take on religious systems or beliefs individually since No proof or evidence that exsists that ANY supernatural belief is any more real than fantasy fiction writing.
wb8594 1 year ago
@wb8594 This has got to be the largest generalization that I have ever received in text comments. To state, as you have, that there is no evidence for God at all goes against the past 50 years of atheistic philosophical discussion ... the majority of atheistic philosophers don't deny evidence that points towards a first mover so I find your comments uninformed.
telemantros 1 year ago