Aerofly FS simulator: first Cessna 172 SP tests
Loading...
15,188
Loading...
Uploader Comments (TUCKIE10)
Top Comments
-
this seems to beat microsoft so damn f***ing hard!
see all
All Comments (63)
-
waaayyyyyy better than fsx
-
WOW!!...Excellent...and the sounds are unbeleivable...why can't other Sims get sound that realistic?
-
@xDD1322 Definitely, both! No need to choose! :)
-
This simulator has moving traffic? And the FPS?
Loading...
Are you on a mac or a PC, because I am on a mac 13" laptop and I really want this but I don't think I can because of the graphics card so can you help me. and can you give me your specs?
4343viking 5 days ago
@4343viking I have a Pc, it's an I7 920 3,33Ghz, 6GB RAM DDR3, Geforce GTX80, Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit, Power Supply Corsair HX 1000w. There is a version for Mac, but a 13" Laptop may not be the best harwdare to run it... Anyway almost no other current simulator runs as smooth as this one!
TUCKIE10 4 days ago 2
@bob7266 - I hope you realize that while the Cessna 172 will get out of a spin without using the "control collum", certain aircraft will prove quite difficult to recover from a stall since the standard procedure (cessna or not) involves pushing forward the "control collum" as you call it. We call it yoke though. now, for the simulator. looks very smooth and promising, you seem to do a very good job and it looks like it already has certain advantages over FSX. please don't fuck it up ;) good luck
innersilencedotcom 2 weeks ago
@innersilencedotcom Thanks for your comment, finally a positive one! :)
TUCKIE10 2 weeks ago