The Baton (pt 1 of 3): "Letter of Resignation"

I've got and have read the book. (word 6 on page 134 is "no")

All I can say right now is thanks for all your work. Opened my eyes, gave me a touchstone for others with the videos and the book. Give your loved ones an extra hug, I'm glad for what you gave us, and I wholly support you getting back on focus with your family. From one sportsracer: Thank you so much.

thanks

@ zumbinis

Lets factor god into the grid and assume that climate change is real.

If god doesn't exist and we do nothing ... bad thing.

If god does exist and we do nothing but god saves us ... good thing.

if god doesn't exist but we still do something that stops climate change ... good thing.

if god does exist and we do something that stops climate change ... good thing.

The grid shows that we are better off doing something and not putting all our faith in god.

Thanks for your hard work and thoughtful presentations. I want to say that your conclusions leave God's promises out of the equation: the Bible explains that current Earth is only temporary. God Himself will judge man and the Earth with more terrible destruction that the global warming scenario (see Revelation chapters 6-19), but will then restore the Earth, and finally replace it with a new, perfect and eternal Earth and Heavens (see the final three chapters of the Bible, Revelation 20-22).

This clip makes me sad. :(

Pascal's wager doesn't inform anyone. Most of the stuff he claims is nonsense anyway. Look up climategate and the numerous IPCC retractions that had to be made since xmas. The alarmism is based on bad science and scams.

I'd wager that this guy has done at hundreds more hours worth of research than you.

If you like at the science done by the skeptics, you will see how poorly done and unfounded most of their methods are.

The skeptics just like the alarmists make mistakes, because that is what humans do. The whole purpose of science is error reduction, and the problem with the alarmists is that they are subverting the rules need to correct their many mistakes. Mistakes like thinking the Himalayan glaciers are going to all melt by 2035, claiming that the MWP did not exist, the hockey stick fraud, inverting data, making unsupportable statistical claims, and so forth.

Hundreds of hours more research and all he's know for is a the global warming equivalent of Pascals Wager.

I've looked at what's been done on both sides and the alarmists have done very shoddy work. Look at the Hymalayan glacier fiasco as just one of hundreds of mistakes.

The purpose of science is error reduction and I recognized the anti-science thinking processes of the alarmists a long time ago. You don't hide data, claim consensus as a scientific principle, or make ludicrous claims.

Thank you thank you thank you, I appreciate how much work you've put into this!!!!!!!!!!