Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ufo's on the Moon? I - a critical investigation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
26,116
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 4, 2007

A 8:59 min slideshow of original unaltered NASA photographs from the Apollo Space Program showing anomalous lights, objects, shadows, dust, debris, different types of optical reflections and so on.
Consider all given identification to represent my personal opinion only (which does NOT reflects NASA). I'm interested in your discussion. The access to Apollo footage is public, free and comprehensive (visit the Lunar and Planetary Institute at www.lpi.usra.edu). Of some photographs high-resolution scans are available at the Project Apollo Archive at www.apolloarchive.com. Please, don't claim an image to be faked before visiting these sites. Music by Eumir Deodato - Also sprach Zarathustra. Hopefully both believers and sceptics will find a way to enjoy.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (amontaiyagala)

  • It is true. When I was on the Moon..I saw UFO and aliens too. We all sat down and had a cup of tea. They were very friendly.

  • What kind of tea do they like?

see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is shit.

  • great!

    

  • The USA government has never seen anything strange in the sky or in the space. NEVER. There has never been a report, evidence or any fact envolving strange lights. Never. Calm down people. The USA government knows about everything strange in the history of the world. THERE IS NOTHING IN THE SPACE. NOTHING ON THE MOON. ALL THE PEOPLE THAT TALK ABOUT STRANGE LIGHTS ARE LUNATICS. THESE LIGHTS ARE SWAMP GAS OR BALLONS. FOOLS.

  • UFO's are real i have to say.. i have seen one myself. My point is that we are not the only ones out here.We cant be the only planet with life on it, there are millions, billions of planets out there... There must be ONE planet that haves life on it!? RIGHT!?

  • amazing footage!

  • @clemstevenson ...continued: The reason NASA didn't go to the Moon last year, or can do it next year is that there are no flyable Saturn V's or Apollo ships left. It takes time to develop, build and test new hardware. And, as I said: No one will pay for it.

    No, I'm not going to try to get You to like "A Clockwork orange". I only wish You could appreciate what mankind is able to do when "we" want. Like going to the Moon.

  • @clemstevenson Well, I'm no American either, so I don't "defend" anything. For example, in my opinion, the Russians build safer spaceships and more robust trucks and fighterplanes. I just look at facts. I've followed the spaceprogrammes for decades, and I have no doubt Apollo went to the Moon.

    The reason no one does it today is pure economical. NASA had planned to do it around 2020, but the politicians cut the funds. Continuing...

  • @YDDES Art is pure subjectivism, and thus there is no rational way you can persuade me to like 'A Clockwork Orange'. Likewise, I think that Vincent Van Gough was nothing more than a nut case who should have stuck to using crayon. Because the USA is a foreign country, I don't feel any need to patriotically defend the Apollo program. If Americans could get to the moon in 1969, then why can't they manage it now? Are they scared of aliens, or didn't they go in the first place?

  • @clemstevenson ...continuing: Just as he hadn't planned to show the early humans as hairy apes. But, since they had to be naked, he couldn't find any other way to show them in full length (stupid American bigottery).

    And, Kubrick did NOT direct any lunar landings as stated by several "Hoax-idiots". Nothing in the real films remind of what he did in "2001". Not the landscape, nor the movements or the dusts behaviour, for example.

  • @clemstevenson In my opinion "A Clockwork Orange" was a real piece of art. Maybe the violence could have been a little lesser, but it was necessary for the plot. The opening scene wiyh its music was just beautiful.

    Pity he didn't live to make "A.I."

    Anyhow, "2001" had nothing to do with Apollo. And, Kubrick had initially planned to show the aliens, but couldn't find a way to do it without using actors in stupid suits. Continuing...

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more