New Theory-Planetary Formation

new theory of planet formation Galaxy cycle

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• new
• theory
• of
• planetary
• formation
• cosmology
• astronomy
• astrophysics
• space
• star
• planet
• moon
• asteroid
• meteor
• comet
• sun
• earth
• lunar
• terra
• bigbang
• wrong

[cobu2002]

Nice idea because the real title is "Cosmic Bubbles and the Mother Rock". It just happens to be an 'extension' of the ideas in the Plasma Universe. If you study Dr. Anthony Peratts' work on the plasma universe, you will see that all it need is a central power source- the Mother Rock. Deep in the center of the rock is a charge of antimatter which fuels the plasma jets from both sides and gives all the characteristic signatures associated with radiation. Thanks for the input-check out my website.

[cobu2002]

The universe has no origin; it has always existed and always will. Only the simplest of human minds cannot comprehend this.

[mharratsc]

@cobu2002 Whereas I do agree with you regarding 'no origin', I have to state that your reference to Plasma Cosmology is WAY wide of the mark. Active galactic nuclei emit gamma rays, x-rays, copious radio waves, etc- unless your Mother Rock is a radioactive isotope then it doesn't really fit current observations of AGN's. Maybe you would consider changing this to 'Mother Rock Cosmology' instead?  o.O

[Surfxeo]

Mother rock? Sounds like paganism.

I know all about the plasma universe and it has nothing to do with the origin of the universe. It only explains the here and now, where science belongs. We do not need "artists impressions" to explain science. Leave that to the big bang theorists.

This is not what the plasma universe is about.

[JPO1618]

A giant rock!? Really!?

Really!?

[corrob]

ok this is new, i like hearing new theories on stuff, but it seems a mother rock would be much easier to find, especially if one is forming at the center of the galaxy, or is it a black hole that pulls the mass together into the mother rock form? what is the force pulling it in together? interesting stuff, if the ionosphere is plasma, have you checked out what h.a.a.r.p. does? ionosphere testing,weather control, mind control, if this plasma theory is right then they are manipulating it.thoughts?

[bersaba]

medicines say "oh no, I've got the cure for cancer, it's to swim with dolphins", I cringe and call them a crank. Why? Because the don't have evidence. They don't have data, causality, nor education.

Now your theory, to be proven correct, needs to do a few things.

1: Be based on observable data.

2: Have as good or better predictions.

3: Agree with other areas outside your theory.

That is, your theory needs to match what we see, better predict what we do see, and counter the old theory. Goodluck

[bersaba]

Ok then let me ask you this. You say you aren't a scientist, yet you insist that the universe is able to be understood and it's not complicated. Is it not possible, perhaps, that you're wrong? Could it be that there's a lot more going on in the universe, and a lot more evidence and so on, then you understand?

To put it another way. I'm a nurse. I did 3years of training at university covering all sorts of things from physiology to law. When I hear people in the 'alternative health'

[cobu2002]

I totally agree with you, I am the 'mr. Y' who states everyone else is wrong. And I, like you, do not have the expertise in anything to be called a scientist.

People who wish to control others through the use of misinformation, such as incorrect theories, will attempt to convince you their ideas are too complicated to understand. That's just wrong. The universe is much simpler, but I am not out to change your mind; I will only show you a picture and you decide. I appreciate all views.

[bersaba]

Then what's your research? Where have you done the research? What's your education and background? It's all well and good to make claims like "mother rock" and "Nuclear Fusion has never been proven" (Which as far as I recall it has due to weight, gravity effect, and spectrograph.. but who knows, I'm not a scientist).

When there's a million people that say X and one that says Y, it doesn't mean Y is wrong (look at Galileo), but it does mean Y better be damn good and have the evidence.