Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Rather's Question, Was the Warren Commission wrong?

In this video I show that the last two shots were fired 0.7 seconds apart which shows that there was more than the one shooter than the government has repeatedly said. To prove that is true, I sho...  
 
Customize

More From: SCGATOR2001

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
24 ratings
Sign in to rate
3,265 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (1)

View All - Play All
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (140)   Options

Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
AlmeidaFan (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Reply
Check out your video at 5:14. Blood can already be seen pooling on his jacket, right by his armpit, exactly where Connally had been shot. If you were to go close in on that spot and run the film in slo-mo, you would see the pool of blood widening.
ignatiusjk (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Reply
Do you believe that there were five shots or just three? Everyone who was there seems to agree on hearing just three shots. Why hasn't anyone said anything about five shots or more than three?
SCGATOR2001 (3 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
There were FIVE shots that were detected by the acoustic evidence. Do you believe that 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds could be on two independent ways to measure the shot spacing if both didn't actually detect the shots?

Not everyone said three shots but if you listen to the description of some who heard three shots you'll find they said a shot, then a pause and then two shots almost on top of each other.

Many other witnesses said the shots were about equally spaced

That alone means FOUR.
AlmeidaFan (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Reply
People did report more than three shots. Their testimony just didn't happen to make it into the Warren Commission report. As for those who only heard three? They probably started counting after they realized it was gunfire (meaning, the first shot probably didn't even register in their minds); plus, the "third" shot was two shots fired virtually on top of each other, which likely counted as one shot, not two, in a lot of people's minds.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
Mobilecheese (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Reply
You lookin for another asshole cut in your belly, boy? So you kin talk outa that one, too? Huh? cdddraftsman boy. You done gone took a wrong turn on the river, boy! Ah ain't no hillbilly and your gonna squeal like a pig when me and my little brother Jethro get a hold o' you, boy! Now squeal,boy! I said squeal boy! Squeal!
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
LastLemming (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Reply
Sigh. . .drumming fingers. . .waiting. . .
VinnyVoom444 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Reply
Bob Harris has shoved it up the Lone Nut Sheeple Squad's asses yet again...

watch?v=sNoLVyUCdmY

watch?v=GeQCu7m3vmw

Ooops! Good luck explaining this away with anything remotely resembling fact or logic.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.