9/11: "Puffballs" -- Busted

A demonstration that the gif file, currently circulating, purporting to show puffs of smoke in the wrong place on the Evan Fairbanks video is a load of nonsense. There is no sound on this video.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• debunking
• puffballs
• video
• fakery
• no
• planes
• 9/11
• conspiracy

[jawsflounderace]

1:34 Compare the bottom shot in this one to the bottom one the first time. He tampered with it to make it seem like the puffball was above and below the wing.

[alawson911]

@jawsflounderace

Where do get off telling lies?

My video does NOT show that the "puffball" in the Evan Fairbanks video is above the wing, in any sequence. It can be seen developing in the frozen-frame sequence at around counter 1:30, as the plane's wing disappears into the building, but before the puffball has fully developed. Not even Chuck Yeager would have been able to say that it developed above or below such an out-of-focus something that was in the process of disappearing.

[alawson911]

The guy who claimed that the "puffball" was in the wrong place, has now recanted, and admitted that he was mistaken. His name is Rasga Saias, and, along with a few other, former staunch no-planers, he now agrees that the case for real planes, but not their origins, has been made. It takes a lot of courage to admit one's mistakes, and I admire these guys for doing so.

[ISamuelII]

ALawson, what exactly is that 'no-planer' bait you use?

I am in a fog as to which "puff" this is about.

Why do some people not understand there is a strong frame the thin sheet aluminium of a plane is attached to. The nose has massive amounts of copper and other materials in it than thin metal sheets.

Maybe get a (TeeVeeShow) to shoot copper electronics, alloy struts, and pig flesh through 1/4 steel at the rates they did.

9 11 inside job

[quez76]

@alawson911 you shouldnt have to prove that they were fake, its obvious they were fake, like the chopper fox news nose out video...

[alawson911]

@MrGeassR2

In almost 10 years, no one has ever been able to prove that any of the major videos of the plane hitting the South Tower were faked. So we know almost exactly what happened, and experts have roughly worked out how much fuel would have been expended in the initial fireball, and other experts have determined that what was left over, plus office equipment and other material was not enough to weaken 47 central columns of structural steel to a point that they would collapse as they did.

[MrGeassR2]

The reason everyone is making up all these conspiracy stuff like " the steel building aluminum plane stuff" is because no one knows what exactly a plane hitting a building looks like BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENS. So before you go and dissect something calling it fake make sure you know what it looks like first you've never seen this before in your life so you cant say "oh no no that didn't look right." Because you've never seen it before. No one has!

[alawson911]

@MrGeassR2

It seems that we agree that the planes were real, but the large group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth does not agree that the fuel brought the buildings down. Look up their website.

[MrGeassR2]

and this cage had THIN steel bars given the planes size shape and speed would more slice through the wings and aluminum of the plane making sparks and setting the 15000 gallons fuel ablaze BOOOOOOOM such an immense heat would blow the floor away and ignite everything thats flamable and its gonna be HOT. Enough to melt the remainder of the cage the plane went through that is the world trade center.

[MrGeassR2]

@alawson911 Okay I'm not saying our government didn't do it but I dont think bombs were planted and I sure as hell don't think the planes were CGI during the broadcast. I think the government who were responsible for the construction of those building know exactly how much it would take to knock those buildings over. A plane is sufficient enough given it's full fuel tanks 15000 gallons the building did have a steel frame but it wasnt a solod block of wall it was like a cage not a solid wall.

[alawson911]

@MrGeassR2

No, but I can prove that the murder weapons were never identified, which indicates some kind of coverup. See my video:

9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons

[MrGeassR2]

@alawson911 can u provide proof that our government did it? i.e. the president saying yes we were at fault for 9/11?