Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Past & Future Climate change pt 3 of 4

Part 3 - Scientist David Archibald continues giving the data that shows global climate is more influenced by factors other than CO2 including a correlation with sunspot cycle length. The conclusion...  
 
Customize

More From: Bushvision

Past & Future Climate Change - pt 4 of 44:30
6,213 views
Why the IPCC models are wrong - Part 18:34
6,154 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1 of 49:41
264,834 views
David Evans - Why CO2 cannot be blamed for Global warming8:43
15,209 views
David Archibald - Global Warming & Sunspots explained9:34
22,698 views
Past & Future Climate change - Pt 1of 49:21
17,248 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - pt 3 of 48:29
71,176 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?-  pt 4 of 49:35
76,840 views
Evidence CO2 does not cause dangerous Global warming1:50
14,500 views
35 Inconvenient Truths part 19:48
11,103 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of Co2 part 28:30
9,722 views
The case against global warming Pt 49:23
902 views
35 Inconvenient Truths part 28:52
4,515 views
Professor Fred Singer on Climate Change Pt  17:12
7,248 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of CO2 part 19:44
17,523 views
Science & social aspects of climate change pt 29:29
2,443 views
he case against dangerous global warming pt 1T9:00
1,531 views
Past & Future Climate Change - Pt 2 of 48:53
5,331 views
climatology, ocean circulation & climate change8:35
1,140 views
Professor Fred Singer on Climate Change pt 28:53
3,932 views

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

31 ratings
Sign in to rate
4,421 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (7)   Options

Loading...
markcrisp07 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
so he admits Co2 does increase tempertaure? Because all these other "anti GW" are saying Co2 has no effect on temperature at all....

"Increased Co2 is somethong we can only dream about..." He lost all credibility on this one...
andharvey8 (5 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
We shoud make the entire US Congress sit down and watch this, and have the electorate give them a pop-quiz afterwards to make sure they were paying attention to the lecture.
MarkusKellow (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The correlation between cloud cover and cosmic rays is interesting.
Kellanon06 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -5
Marked as spam
this man isn't a scientist
Bushvision (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Define a scientist & you might be surprised
shire2005 (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The man is a geologist and very qualified for the topic.

Liberals who believe in the GW fraud are mystified by people with no scientific credentials like Al Gore or Barry Obama who don't even have undergraduate courework in the sciences beyond the freshman level.
DoubleJMG (1 year ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
The graphic on CO2 levels and plant growth should be a kick in the crotch to greens. Shouldn't they know that?
jhg3 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Finally the truth!!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.