Perception Test presented by 9/11 Truth Montreal

A perception test given to test whether or not people identified the collapse of WTC Building 7 as a controlled demolition or "natural" collapse.

****************************************

Youtube has disabled the audio for this video, but it can still be viewed with audio at this website:

http://www.filmclick.com/index.php?section=film.index&filmid=3261228198886

****************************************

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• Truth
• Montreal
• September
• 11
• WTC7
• Building
• World
• Trade
• Center
• Twin
• Towers
• conspiracy
• theory
• controlled
• demolition
• illuminati
• nwo
• false
• flag

[MTL911Truth]

Buildings come in all sorts of sizes in all 3 dimensions.

Yes Arrowhead they do come in all three dimensions. You really are an expert aren't you? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[MTL911Truth]

The fact remains, A TALLER BUILDING IS WEAKER THAN A SHORTER ONE.

No Arrowhead, this is not true. Sorry to tell you, but just because you keep saying it doesn't make it true. In the real world there are things called building codes, and they specify that taller buildings have to be stronger than shorter ones. You should look it up one day while studying the three dimensions.

[d0m1n4t1]

Excellent work.

[Tuflitl1]

9/11 WAS an inside job. The Federal Reserve WAS hijacked by private bankers in 1913. The F/R bankers HAVE infiltrated mainstream media, all levels of Gov, education, medical AND RELIGION to the Vatican... easy to pay off people when you literally create money. Grandad Bush, DID finance Hitler. Constitution IS being dismantled. Wake up you freakin' sheep.

[wimahlers]

The natural collapse would be the one that was burning for hours, had no explosive sounds and no explosive flashes at the moment of collapse. That would be number 4. Even though, deceptively, this person never showed the sound by either of these collpases. Because that would be a dead give away. By the way, WTC7 collapsed for the exact same reason as the substantial internal collapse of WTC5: Fires!

Connclusion: The person with the soundless laptop wasted his time with these street interviews.

[guywakingup]

by the way Youtube has removed the sound from this when i play it....

[daelka]

Here's what it says: "NOTICE This video contains an audio track that has not been authorized by all copyright holders. The audio has been disabled. "

[daelka]

There is no sound. It says audio is blocked for copyright issue - although they don't say by whom.

[123ziran]

Most people pointing to number 2 because the explosives are too strong

[ArrowHead83]

You're projecting again. Hell, I wouldn't even say you have the intelligence of an 8th grader. That would be insulting to 8th graders.

Buildings come in all sorts of sizes in all 3 dimensions. The fact remains, A TALLER BUILDING IS WEAKER THAN A SHORTER ONE. Another fact: WTC7 had a smaller footprint than 5 or 6.

My argument is meaningless? No, you're just stubborn to the extreme. Denying facts when they don't fit your twisted worldview and theory... well, because it's only theory.

[MTL911Truth]

man you are like 8th grade level intelligence aren't you?

A building that is 50x50 would be weaker if it was 100 stories tall you're right arrowboy. But in the real world, where the rest of us live, the 100 storey building would not have the same footprint as a 10 story building, so your argument is meaningless, as the rest of them seem to be as well. Good luck in life arrowboy, you're going to need it.

[ArrowHead83]

(continued)

"[...] Are u saying Building 7 had the same footprint?"

No, I was saying that for example, if you had two buildings that were both, say 50 meters wide by 50 meters deep, but one was 10 stories and the other was 100, it would be easier to cause the taller one to collapse.

Me betraying my ignorance? Hardly. You're projecting - you're the one showing yourself to be ignorant.