Sexual Alternatives: Can We Have Sex With NO Risk of HIV?

From his HIV diagnosis in 1985 until his death in April of 2009, Cass Mann was one of the world's longest-term HIV-positive survivors. He founded Positively Healthy, the UK's only HIV/AIDS charity staffed exclusively by openly gay men, which provided HIV services including education, support, and peer counselling. These videos now archive his wisdom and insight for future generations. Here he talks about alternatives to anal sex and oral sex that don't carry the risk of HIV transmission. Mutual masturbation and frottage (rubbing against your partner) do not carry the risk of HIV transmission. We in the West have a "wham bam" culture in which these alternatives may seem less exciting at first, but they can be very pleasurable. You can investigate Tantric sexuality, Taoism, or the Kama Sutra for gay men. "Wham bam" sex isn't nurturing; it's almost always abusive, violent, and non-nurturing. These alternatives are lengthier, more satisfying, nurturing and enlightening. In the Indian, Tibetan and Taoist Tantric Yoga systems, they activate all your chakras, leading to an awakening from unconsciousness into enlightenment that is the end-point of all sex acts. For more information about HIV and AIDS, visit http://www.AIDSvideos.org/. This video is freely downloadable from http://www.archive.org/details/SexualAlternativesCanWeHaveSexWithNoRiskOfHivT... . [Do you want to help prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS? Are you fluent in a language other than English? Then volunteer to translate our videos into other languages! Click http://AIDSvideos.org/translate.shtml to to learn how you can help!!! © Copyright 2008-2011 Global Lifeworks. All rights reserved. This work is licensed to be used for non-commercial purposes under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.]

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• HIV
• AIDS
• mutual
• masturbation
• frottage
• sexual
• alternatives
• tantra
• tantric
• tao
• indian
• tibetan
• kama
• sutra
• sex
• enlightenment

[PhilipRochester]

I have long practiced Taoist Sexual Yoga, which concentrates on non-penetrative and non-ejaculatory sex between partners, and have discovered depths and levels of sexual bliss and joy that penetrative and ejaculatory sex denied me for all the years I indulged. I found robotic sex repetitive and mechanical, and as soon as I had sex with one man immediately wanted sex with someone else. Cass brilliantly points out that gay men often have sex to avoid intimacy and to anaesthetise themselves with.

[fuckserbrussians1]

im not a homosexual, but these videos are educational even though i pretty much know all about hiv/aids, still interesting

[cltony1987]

I think this type of thing may be very useful for people who are HIV positive and want to continue to have a sex life. However, I think portraying penetrative sex as abusive is misleading. Penetrative sex with your partner can be an incredibly sensual and fulfilling experience within the context of a loving relationship where both partners are definitely HIV negative.

[BlueAstral12]

Christ is a catalyst for what love is ... one that's been scuid in past time people were consuming hate and pride And distrust , today people are consuming the flesh desires , Unconnected and uncollcted thoughtlees action distraction destruction and also distrust. type - perfume orgy into search ... u may be repulse#d ... I'm sorry u doint carry shame for intence passion

[Jibjub80]

I will say one thing. I do like this man's analogy about driving on a country road enjoying the views versus on a race track without a seatbelt. Frottage can be fun, which he mentioned, so long as the guy does not have herpes. I do think that oral sex is a low risk activity, not risk free, but quite low.

[devaloki]

very great video! i agree about frot

[AIDSvideos]

Though some have claimed to be cured of HIV, no such claim has ever been objectively proven to be true. THINKING you were HIV+ and then cured of HIV does not mean that's what actually happened. For example, sometimes people get false positive test results, particularly on an initial ELISA test. Since there is no scientific evidence that HIV can be cured and much reason to think it's currently incurable, I find such claims highly suspect. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

[AIDSvideos]

A good Christian does not advise other Christians to throw away their Bible or to burn it, which is what you just suggested that I do. Please calm down and accept that others may differ from you on the interpretation of the Bible and that doesn't guarantee that you are right and they are wrong. Have the humility to accept that you, being human, may err, just as I may.

[AIDSvideos]

You do not win people to Christ by telling them to abandon their faith or burn their Bible. My faith does not require that God cure HIV on demand for anyone who accepts Christ as their savior. Yours apparently does. Which of us has the stronger, unconditional faith that accepts God's sovereignty and freedom of choice? Do not insist on miraculous specific proofs of God's existence or the power of faith. That is making your faith superstitious. Have a faith that is strong and demands no magic.

[AIDSvideos]

Believing that some herbs have beneficial properties or that some diseases can be cured doesn't mean that every disease is curable. In my view, God *can* do all things (including curing any disease), but that does not mean that he *does* choose to do specific things (like curing people who are HIV+, for which there is no scientifically documented case anywhere worldwide).

[AIDSvideos]

If you promise people that if they accept Christ as their savior they are guaranteed to be cured of a specific disease (particularly HIV), you are setting up expectations that are unlikely to be fulfilled. This will create a crisis of faith when the new Christian finds that they have not been magically cured of their disease as you promised. It's much better to win people to Christianity by explaining the spiritual benefits and eternal life it DOES promise.

[AIDSvideos]

Believing in God and the Bible does not require that we: (1) accept Prescious3's interpretation of the Bible, (2) take every verse literally, (3) believe that accepting Christ as your savior means that you will be cured of all physical disease (that's a misguided interpretation in my view; Christianity isn't a magical "get out of jail free" card; good Christians die of disease all the time). Christ may heal your *soul* while leaving a physical disease in place.