Lacewing Larvae, Giant Killer

Transcript - http://www.creationmoments.net/radio/transcript.php?t=1387

Green Lacewing Larvae feed primarily on soft-bodied garden pests - primarily aphids. The larvae are a natural enemy of aphids but also feed on other garden pests including mites and pest insect eggs. While the adult Green Lacewing feeds primarily on nectars and pollens, in the larvae stage of the Green Lacewing are voracious natural predators of a large number of pest insects including garden aphids

"Creation Moments" daily 2 minute radio/broadcast with host Ian Taylor is heard around the world on over 1300 stations and outlets. Each program features scientific evidences of nature that points to delicate design not evolutionary chance. Creation Moments http://www.creationmoments.net 2 minute radio programs - http://www.creationmoments.net/radio/archives.php Business Hours: Mon-Fri: 8:00am to 4:30pm E-mail: info@creationmoments.com Phone & Fax: Toll Free: 1- 80... Local: 1-320-968-4092 Fax: 320-968-4094 Write us at: Creation Moments PO Box 839 Foley, MN 56329 Visit our office at: 19365 65th St NE Foley, MN 56329

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Lacewing
• Larvae

[fume0ne]

wow

one eyed man is kind and all that

[agchains78543]

@luovahulluus We still dont twist things, we strive for the truth as much as you do but most things already fall into our theories and the bible. Most evolutionary theories change as new things are discovered, neither of the two sides twist things, but both try to understand things about earth and life in the best and most logical way possible carbon dating has faults and according to creation those genetics were created in life and the bible DOES NOT state the age of the earth. research it.

[luovahulluus]

@agchains78543 Perhaps the two strongest evidences of evolution are genetics and radiocarbon dating. These both completely DESTROY any credibility that the creationists may ever have had. Those both are pretty well explained in Wikipedia. For once have an open mind and check them out.

[luovahulluus]

@agchains78543 When a creationist hears about a new scientific find he simplifies or adds to it to make it fit his story. When a scientist hears about the new find he examines it and compares it to the current theory. If the find doesn't support the theory, he adjusts the theory to make it as close to the truth as possible. Scientists don't know everything but they strive for the truth. Creationists don't know everything, but they make their best to twist the evidence to support their story.

[agchains78543]

@luovahulluus Christians don't "twist" things and more scientific theories support creation than do evolution, notice how evolutionists change entire theories as new evidence comes to fit evolution howeverit already fits creation. evolutionists "twist" things not christians.

[BereanBeacon1]

@luovahulluus LOL



[luovahulluus]

@BereanBeacon1 Ah, a great thing about science is, much of it IS in the open, and anyone can read it!

"If you have evidence that evolution is false, you are entirely at liberty to submit a paper to the Editor of Nature, or Science[...] Do not fear that Editors will reject it simply because it opposes evolution. [...] the journal that published a paper which really did discover a fallacy in evolution [...] would have the scoop of the century!"

-Richard Dawkins

Haven't seen articles like that.

[BereanBeacon1]

@luovahulluus Ah, a debate would would bring all your "science" into the open and then you would lose. 

[luovahulluus]

@BereanBeacon1 That's easy to answer. Supporters of ID and creationism disrecard most of scientific evidence and the tough questions like "Why do you assume lacewings would have been "madly waving their abdomens" at insects before it was any use for them?" The scientific evidence that is not disrecarded by them is usually twisted somehow to seemingly support something very unscientific. You should also familiarize yourself with Russell's teapot (Can be found on Wikipedia)

[BereanBeacon1]

@luovahulluus There are NO evolutionists who will defend there position in a science controlled public forum.

Why is that? If you can find one, you will be paid a $1,000.