Sviatoslav Richter plays Tchaikovsky Concerto No. 1 (4/4)

Part IV
Tchaikovsky: Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor, Op. 23
3. Allegro con fuoco
Conductor: Karel Ancerl

Category:

Music

Tags:

• sviatoslav
• richter
• tchaikovsky
• concerto
• piano
• classical

[willistara]

Such SPIRIT in execution! I sit in awe, moments fading and forgotten for all their worthlessness, inspired and enriched. Richter presents thru his execution an intensity of emotion that can cut through your soul.

[marighim2008]

Merci pour la video! *****

[khongcothithoi]

bon, mais je préfère Martha Argerich sur ce concerto :)

[bugra885]

aren't you really fed up with taking the "octaves" of this movement as if there isn't anything else but that octaves passage in the whole movement..what makes that interesting to play these octaves as fast as possible and talk about them under each of this movement and compare the pianists according to these octaves... come on, please, really enough...

[BenMcCormack91]

At this level, it doesn't pay to worry about technical ability. Speculating about whether or not Richter could have played the octaves faster than Argerich or Horowitz is pretty much worthless; I'm sure Horowitz and Argerich could have played the octaves even faster than they did, but they don't. At this level of technical mastery, I'm concerned only by interpretation; whether or not they make the piece of music interesting for me. Now, I will leave that hanging... by not giving my opinion.

[jeffsteinway]

Richter is the greatest.

[Sinfoniette]

I always thought too many judgements on a rendition of this concerto is simply based on the difficult octave passage. There is more than sheer virtuosity to this concerto and should not be judged by only that matter. (Although I frankly believe that technical virtuosity is kind of required to play this, heh.)

[RDSerebrianny]

See comments on Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto in "Conversations with Menuhin." Almost every violinist tried to play more beautifully and brilliantly than colleagues, so it was over-played, over-used, yet amazingly well played more often than almost any other work. Look at it as vehicle of self-display in the West (too general statement I know), but Russians play it somewhat more disciplined, and the music loses nothing. Very similar case with piano concerto and conservatory octave competition?

[alexggable]

Argerich had a lot of problems trying to decrease her octaves speed.

She played like an automated robot those octaves, and according to my point of view, she breaked up the balance of the concerto because of this...

[truecrypt]

I think you may find useful to learn a bit more about the subject... for example listen Scriabin Op. 65, No. 3 - those are 9th (not 8th!) and they are much harder to play than simply octaves. Richter runs through them with astronomical speed and ease.

If you have to say something interesting about performance, please feel free to do so... otherwise your points re speed of octaves has no value whatsoever.

[Liebromeistal]

you've got to admit though. Richter probably couldn't have played the double octaves faster than Horowitz and Argerich (and Gilels probably too)

[truecrypt]

One can easily say that Richter, Gilels, Ginzburg, Rubinstein, Cliburn, Gavrilov, Pletnev (and I probably missed another 5-10) left us performances which are very well up to (if not above) Horowitz and Argerich versions. You measure "better" by the speed of octaves, other people prefer different parameters. Matter of taste, experience and education.