February 2, 1970 Iran ratifies the NPT and is therefore subject to IAEA safeguards agreement protocol
Dec 18, 2003 Iran signs additional protocols agreement with the IAEA, in a bid to disprove U.S. claims it had a secret nuclear bomb program, but it is never ratified in Iranian Parliament.
Nov. 14, 2004 Iran with the E3/EU England,Germany and France re-establish and build on their agreement on Iran's nuclear program made Oct. 21, 2003
The U.S. refuses to engage in dialog with Iran. Iran reaffirms that "it does not and will not seek to acquire nuclear weapons and voluntarily agrees to continue and extend it's suspension to include all enrichment and reprocessing activities... which will equally provide guarantees on nuclear, economical, technological and security cooperation. and The E3/EU will support the IAEA Director General inviting Iran to join the Expert Group of Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, The E3/EU will actively support the opening of Iranian accession negotiations at the (WTO).
July, 2005 Talks break down with E3 as promises to Iran are never delivered upon, as the U.S. pressures the IAEA board against Iran and pressures the E3 against Iran.
Sept. 22,2005 IAEA Board hints at sending Iran nuclear issue to U.N. Security Council even though Iran is in full compliance with NPT and regular IAEA safeguards agreement.
Oct.9, 2005 Iran confirms it will not abide by aditional protocols of IAEA, but will follow the law of the NPT and IAEA safeguards which is required under the
NPT treaty.
Feb.22, 2007, IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei made his quarterly report to the IAEA Board of Governors, wherein he concluded
"Pursuant to its NPT Safeguards Agreement, Iran has been providing the Agency with access to declared nuclear material and facilities, and has provided the required nuclear material accountancy reports in connection with such material and facilities..The Agency is able to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran." Hence, Iran was in compliance with its NPT obligations.
Mar. 24, 2007 The U.N. Security Council passes Resolution 1747 that requires Iran to suspend all enrichment related activities and calls for an arms embargo and asset freezing . This while Iran has been declared compliant within NPT and IAEA safeguards, but not inline with the IAEA additional protocols by the IAEA Board.
Now, bear in mind that the whole world knows that Iran is fully complying with all its NPT obligations, yet is allowing us to intimidate other nations into denying Iran its "inalienable rights" under the NPT to peacefully enrich uranium. The Council -- acting under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the UN Charter -- "reaffirms" that Iran "shall, without further delay, take the steps required by the IAEA Board of Governors in its resolution GOV/2006/14."What that language means is that the Security Council has decided -- under Article 39 of Chapter VII -- that Iran's Safeguarded nuclear programs constitute a "threat to the peace, breach of peace, or act of aggression" and therefore calls upon all UN member states to apply "complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations" All five U.N. Security Council members voted for lies. Why are China and Russia allowing this nonsense?
Since Condi Rice became Secretary of State, the IAEA Board of Governors have been demanding Iran provide them far, far more information than is required to be -- in some cases even could be -- supplied under the Iran-IAEA Safeguards Agreement
Mar. 29, 2007, Iran informed the IAEA that it had "suspended" its voluntary implementation of the so-called Additional Protocol to its Safeguards Agreement which had been "accepted in 2003, but not yet ratified by it's Parliament."
Aug. 27 2007 Iran has resolved U.N/IAEA questions about tests with plutonium, a key fuel for atomic bombs, and the IAEA considers the matter closed, according to the text of an IAEA-Iran accord released on Monday.
Iran and the IAEA reached a deal on August 21 meant to clarify questions about indications of illicit attempts to make atomic bombs in Iran's declared drive for peaceful nuclear energy -- suspicions led by the U.S. that helped lead to U.N. sanctions against Tehran.
The plan's other goal is to ensure regular, effective access for IAEA inspectors to Iran's underground uranium enrichment plant where it plans industrial production of nuclear fuel.
And the plan also declares that once Iran had clarified the issues listed, the IAEA would declare there were "no remaining questions and ambiguities" about Iran's past activity, a gesture U.S. analysts called problematic without more sweeping inspections.
Iran has insisted that it seeks only electricity, not explosives, from enriched uranium.
IAEA is useless just a political tool. How about israhell nukes? Sacntions!
antekification 1 year ago
@antekification Yes good question.
J1Goro 1 year ago
How did India and Pakistan get nuclear weapons? The Liberal Party idiots in Canada,
sold them CANDU nuclear reactors. Iran will get it's hands on WMD one way or another..bomb Iran? I am not the CIA..lol
AcePilot101 4 years ago
Hey whatever makes you happy.
J1Goro 4 years ago
This is very encouraging news. What is not so encouraging is that so few people know the truth about the cooperation of Iran with the IAEA and so this ignorance lets people become pawns in the hand of the enemies of God as they spread false stories and sow conflict in the world
enotes9 4 years ago
Maybe more would know the truth if I and others weren't so lazy :(
J1Goro 4 years ago