Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

David Brooks - Bushies Think Clinton Provides Best Legacy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
12,674
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 12, 2008

David Brooks on the Tim Russert show commenting on how Bush administration officials think a Clinton victory will provide the best Bush legacy.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • david brooxs political analysis is brillant

    what a genius

    ive never seen a mealie mouth man

  • Clinton would not attract any independents. Her votes draw only from traditional democrats (and among those, only a portion).

    Obama is their worst nightmare.

    Since when would any self-respecting democrat or independent take their marching orders from the Republicans, anyway --- particularly lately?

    PuhLEEZ!

    Obama '08

  • The Repubs want to run against her because it would be easy to trash her and win. And on the off chance that she wins against them, she would be the easiest to buy off and her ideas will never be employed and her administration would be the most Bushlike than the other Dems. Lets hope the rest of the country can pull out victories like S Carolina did for Obama!

  • OBAMA 08!

  • USeconomy v & seperation of classes^. Checkout DLC on wikipedia -are gop lite. Billary will still take us to a two class system and eternal military.

    WIILyou VOTE a man SPEAKS 4his little woman. A woman who claims i am woman watch me roar, unless she's crying and HE'S there to

    defend her. What an embarassment to women!bush- clinton dinners - securing the elite,at the expense of THE REST.

    Are YOU bought off by a rebate? buy made in china AND vote wrong?

  • We ARE in a worldwide revolution now. Economic, political, religious, military. Whoever has the most hegemony, best Karma, whatever, wins.

    I don't think Obama is qualified to be President. I don't like any of the candidates, but I think Romney is the closest to being qualified.

  • He knew he was saying something controversial. It didn't seem out of character to me. Unless Bloomberg takes a run, Obama is the only candidate worth voting for out of either party. We need a fresh slate and inspirational leadership or we're walking right into an Orwellian nightmare.

  • Well, yes, he has always blinked, but I don't know, it seemed a little different this time. He seemed to be speaking not from his conscious thought but from memory or something. No big deal. Obama and Hillary are not qualified to be President of the United States under any scenario.

  • The blinking seems odd? Brooks winks like that all the time. Bush and the Clintons' both believe in massive executive power. It is crucial to both of their governing philosophies. Top down government. Obama (gasp) actually believes in a bottom up approach. By the people, for the people. The dynasties believe in by the party (theirs), for the party (theirs.) And the culture wars spin endlessly on.

  • It was just a thought. I've been watching Brooks for a long time, and his demeanor seems odd in this vid. I mean with the blinking and all. A little out of character it seems.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more