Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Untitled (After Riley), Excerpt

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,000
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 5, 2008

Clearly the desire for the same is operative in various ways in many domains: at the level of nationality, within the social, in terms of class, or by political identifications, subcultures, etc. Just as frequently, the desire for the same is challenged by its opposite: the desire for the different. One thinks of the capitalist imperatives of horizontal market differentiations, or the temporal shifts of planned obsolescence, both of which are implicated in the manufacture of the drive to consume, and to understand consumption as an exercise of will rather than a submission.

Mary Douglas explains the laws of commensality as an attempt to protect and preserve difference, to defend the boundaries of categories like nature and culture, kosher and treif. But her structural explanations also identify a pattern of zones which extend from the household and divide territory into the locations for alternating type-consistent and intermediary categories of animals. This emanation of proximity based pattern suggests an alternate reading of the relation in the binary same/different: not as boundary defense but rather as shifting gradation. The power of the dyad is that its self-mediating opposition can create a system of graduated waves of similarity and difference that allow the perception of both tendencies simultaneously. Each becomes a phase of a wave which rolls in as necessary and does not obligate the disavowal of the opposite.

The visual logic of Bridget Riley's work exemplifies this sort of standing wave pattern. The paintings are constructed around ideas of systematic change across the space of the canvas. They rely on periodic structures: geometric figures combined in patterns of repetition and difference. The effect is that a balance is maintained between the poles of opposition; they are held in tension. From the stasis of the image one can imagine the wave of difference that could pass across the picture plane; the variations which each canvas instantiates form a cinematic continuum from which they are extracted.
This emanation of proximity based pattern suggests an alternate reading of the relation in the binary same/different: not as boundary defense but rather as shifting gradation. The power of the dyad is that its self-mediating opposition can create a system of graduated waves of similarity and difference that allow the perception of both tendencies simultaneously. Each becomes a phase of a wave which rolls in as necessary and does not obligate the disavowal of the opposite.

In this piece, the systematics of Riley's work are animated in the machine, and their wave-like potential is realized.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Jesus fucking christ..

  • Fantastically put together. What an experience for the viewer.

  • T R I P P Y . . . . :)

  • that's awesome

    ballz were tripped

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more