Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Climategate How Fraud Data Is Created

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,793
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 29, 2010

East Anglia University , again at the centre of scientific global warming & climate change fraud data they are Proven to have fraudulently & falsely attempted to hide the decline in global temperature .. and now, East Anglia University breaks the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny !!! .. but of course, everything is just fine, "the figures are correct" !!! ... Professor John Beddington said "the fundamental science behind man-made global warming was "correct" .. Well ... Is It or is this entire fiasco a huge profit & tax enabling hoax
New revelations confirm that there has been a closing down of & misuse of climate observations data globally, along with the Reduction to around 1,500 weather monitoring stations, down from above 6,000 worldwide, thus data ever since 1990, has been less, and from "higher temperature stations", so being improperly balanced against "Proper Foundation Data" is Bound to give the illusion of temperature rise.

How global warming data was rigged ... This is The MOST Important of recent revelations from around the globe, America, Russia, Uk, while China is watching but not wishing to play .. why? .. well because there is no longer "local" weather monitoring, SOOOO .. using data going back 20 odd years, when 6,000 stations data was creating records that would become "The Norm" .. NOW, only a divergent 1,500 monitoring stations data is being recorded, or rather Used ! .. worse yet, the vast majority of these are all in "warmer regions" .. suburbia and the like .. Thus .. Any halfwit could conclude that. in No Way could these remaining 1,500 stations relate to the best info we've ever had, that today's "Fixed" data could possibly relate to .. being this data is NOT a relevant match ... yet we see the IPCC, the media, & government keeping all this quiet, while an investigation is going to simply brush over all this , enabling the $£billions of taxes to be enforce upon the globe .. is this too big for most to see? yes, so please help spread the truth .. wwe're in trouble, all of us.

You can download the climate change fraud documents from the links below:
http://www.filedropper.com/foi2009
or http://www.megaupload.com/?d=003LKN94
The existing "excitement & all but panic" that's been whipped up by governments, NGO's and folk like me ... ( trusting in the science while unaware of these frauds & the reduction in monitoring stations had taken place) ... have all but herded us into a state of blind faith, the like of which hasn't been seen by even the church in many decades, really should be quietened down some, our governments really should allow dissenting scientists to talk freely, while all the shenanigans of government the EU & IPCC are likewise aired .. get this dirty washing out to the public.

This All Underlines the extent to which we've all been deceived & lied to.
The University of East Anglia breached the Freedom of Information Act by refusing to comply with requests for data concerning claims by It's Own scientists that man-made emissions were causing global warming .. remember, all this after publicly available info PROVES these folks cooked the data.

They Hid an actual Decline in temperatures over these past years, as we've all seen, our winters Are becoming cooler/colder ... this deception was only found when a well intentioned person found a way to read these scientists emails, and yes, these tell us the scientists deceits were know to them and many affiliated folk, yet they continued to be the centre of misinformation & downright lies, this to support the mainstream political wish for global warming & a Carbon Tax ...
Very useful links .. The Death Blow to Climate Science
Climate science hijacked and corrupted by this small group of scientists
Dominant names involved are ones I have followed throughout my career including, Phil Jones, Benjamin Santer, Michael Mann, Kevin Trenberth, Jonathan Overpeck, Ken Briffa and Tom Wigley. I have watched climate science hijacked and corrupted by this small group of scientists. This small, elite, community was named by Professor Wegman in his report to the National Academy of Science (NAS).
CO2 never was a problem and all the machinations and deceptions exposed by these files prove that it was the greatest deception in history, but nobody is laughing. It is a very sad day for science and especially my chosen area of climate science. As I expected now it is all exposed I find there is no pleasure in I told you so. Dr Tim Ball.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/...
Collusion, Corruption, Manipulation and Obstruction
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009...

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (freemanshrout)

  • Would it not be a safe assumption that it could be equally viable that saying that climate change is a fraud would improve sales in oil and slump sales in safer energies? Lets remember that oil companies will do ANYTHING for money that includes downplaying climate change to further their own interests in selling oil to the masses. The scandal here is the misinformation being thrown around as fact. Sadly they are creating so much confusion that no one knows what to do now.

  • @jinx748

    If anything, rises in fuel/energy cost were to pre-empt expected fall in sales ... these rising prices don't reflect much more than "speculation" by speculators .. one would hope government would put an end to all this, seeing how we're all in the mire right now!

Top Comments

  • Man made global warming is a fraud. 5*

  • thanks for this my friend, ..they are misleading us all the way!..in belgium as well..data is used from Ukkel in Brussels..the fraud is international..not only in US but everywhere..

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • When organisations and governments are not totally transparent there is the chance of corruption.

    Our system does not seem to be working.

  • @ChristianYorke

    Although I 100% agree with you, I am not laughing.

    Dumping billions of dollars on a non-issue is excruciatingly frustrating to any honest tax payer with enough brains to realize that there are a near infinite amount of WAY more important actually real/verifiable/proven/pragmat­ic/etc. problems to tackle...

  • @Rockyspoon09 and never use the moons cycles.it doesn't matter that the moon is responsible for what we call the envirnment all together.don't ever put the moon in the equation .thats what tells its a lie.that and an open border for tarrorist to bring womds in through mexico.homland suckery is more like .?

  • haha, the Sun is enetering is hottest phase when we are currently in a solar minimum? I swear some people just make up stats left and right that support their screwed up beliefs.

  • @SpudXXXX The sun is entering in is hotty phase. Peace out!

  • As a geologist, I believe there is indeed some global warming, but that stopped about 15 years ago. However, it appears a lot of the "warming" was fabricated by dropping met stations and "homogenizing" the data. With sunspots on a decline, it appears those that predicted 20 to 30 years of global cooling may be right, and should Katla blow in Iceland, that will add to the cooling. Crops won't grow as well, and frigid conditions will be the norm for many years to come.

  • @SpudXXXX Mann made global warming is a fraud.

  • global warming is a socialist hoax. these collectivist criminals have to be exposed to the sleeping mass herd of tax cattle peasants. wake up the sheeple!

  • This is the first thing I found, took me all of 45 seconds, when actually examining your documents. "Conclusions: From the inputs provided by Professor Zeng, it is quite clear that she (1) had access to

    the station history when compiling the 60‐ and 205‐stations datasets, and (2) used the criteria of few, if

    any, changes inlocation to select the 84‐stations used in the 1990 GRL and 1990 Nature papers. The

    charge of fabrication and/or misrepresentation is false."

  • Scientists manipulate data all the time, it's what we do. Why are no links posted to their published papers? Many, many, many reasons for sampling data.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more