Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

PARABLE OF MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE - MATT.19 - PART 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,217
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 7, 2008

Marriage and Divorce Part 1 Matt. 19:- Jesus was a Preacher (the Sower) of His Word, the Spiritual Principles of God and He was the first anointed Christ (Royal High Priest) of God, called a SATGURU in Panjabi, to appear in the present Dark Age. Jesus was not a teacher of the moral laws of Moses that are formulated by men inspired by His Word. Thus, Moses put on Christ, rejected the riches of Pharaohs and wrote Torah for the chosen people and the Gentile. Moral teacher is called a Rabbi in M.East and a PANDIT or GURU in the East. For the roots of sound moral laws being in His Word, the Rabbi or PANDITS are also said to be the witnesses (moon) to the Light (of the Sun) but not the Lights. An ideal moral teacher has been defined by Jesus in Matt.13.52: Therefore every moral teacher which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man (and not a woman) that is an householder (hereditary priest of a temple as the people of Levi tribe are in the M.East), which bringeth forth out of his treasure (of gnosis) things New (His Word that was preached from the Oral Torah but was received only through the Grace of God and the knowledge of which also enabled the moral teachers to over rule the written Torah. Thus, the seat of His Word could also be called Mercy) and old (the letters of the written Torah that were passed from generation to generation through teaching of the letters or Scriptures). Thus, John, the Baptist of Levi tribe and in the line of Aaron was an ideal moral teacher, a super ruler, who feared not the secular rulers in proclaiming his moral judgements over such moral issues as to the king Herod marrying the wife of Philip. Whereas Jesus being not a moral teacher, He neither gave His judgements over moral issues, even on the woman caught red-handed in adultery, nor baptised anyone in water. Now, whatever applies to the flesh, the opposite applies to soul e.g. the moral teachers are the super rulers, the spiritual Preachers, the Apostles, are the super Servants; the moral teachers impose their views, the spiritual Preachers do not do so but make a request; moral laws are learnt by the letters whereas the Spiritual Principles are understood by spirit through the Grace of God; moral laws are based upon the tit-for-tat animal instincts whereas the Spiritual Principles are based upon the spirit of humble presentation of the other cheek; etc. Thus, the Parable of Marriage and Divorce is a sound example of the application of above Spiritual Principle and it cannot be understood unless a person has the ears to hear His Word through the Grace of God. Thus, some Pharisees (teachers of the moral laws, who were well drunk with the old wine of the letters) came to test Jesus. Those arrogant Pharisees were jealous of Jesus because Jesus was the Senior Preacher of the Spiritual Principles that the junior teachers of the moral laws were not familiar with. Therefore, the arrogant and orthodox Pharisees of letters could not help but argue with Jesus over matters that were even not clear to themselves. The Pharisees asked (on the basis of the moral laws), Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason? Here, the Pharisees have asked Jesus a question on the moral code of marriage and divorce in which the two persons, male and female, are involved. But as Jesus was not a moral teacher, He answered this question, through an analogy, by dictating the Spiritual marriage and divorce, in which the abstract self soul is the male that marries the concrete self flesh, the female. And this is how Jesus dictated this very important and instructive concept of the Spiritual marriage and divorce between the soul and the flesh that baffled not only the arrogant Pharisees but also some of His own Labourers as well.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (nijjhar1)

  • If you want to say the teaching on divorce in Matthew 19 is spiritual and not about the flesh, you need some sort of proof. Do you not realize that the same scriptures you are saying you judge by your "conscience and feelings" condemn you by saying that people will come who will pervert the Word through through vain imagination and dreams. You may not be puffed upon dreams, but you are full of vain imagination.  I pray the Spirit teaches you not to arrogantly pervert God's word.

  • Brother,

    First know what you see, then what is not seen of God but perceived would be known to you. Now, please establish the covenant of Jews with Abraham as Abraham was not a Jew but a Semite. In whose name John, baptised men in water?

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice hair Asian women #lushfmlk.info#

  • Jesus was not a satguru, However he is the Avatar

  • Demon's maggots scrape away the body in decay. From the inside until your savior is empty. His failure is cleansed by your hatred. Your god stands below dark emptiness. Lost and forgotten in the cold depths. Glaring up from the bottom arises Satan. The body of christ shall satisfy his hunger. Vomit your pallid beliefs. As you live to suffer in ignorance. Save your false pity for those who care. Purged of the will to live your life. You have nothing but a lifeless prayer.
  • LOOL TOTALLY (Y)

  • you are awesome! :)

  • You're funny.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more