Tupolev 144 www.avijacija.com.mk

Tupolev 144 crashes at Paris air show 1973. www.avijacija.com.mk Tupolev 144 se srushuva na pariskoto air show 1973.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• www.avijacija.com.mk
• Paris
• air
• show
• 1973
• Tupolev
• 144
• crash

[sgtdfeat]

@ghbuzt finally, i must say i'm not against the Concorde as you may verywell think. I am exited to see it in 2012, won't be in real live. I simply am still convinced the tu-144 was a slight improvment in comparison with the Concorde. I think i will leave it here cause i am no longer interessed in putting time in this discuttion.

[sgtdfeat]

@ghbuzt finally i must say i made a mistake on your book part. i must have read it too fast as i surely will never denie the bleuprints were stolen. i have simply misread on that one. I was even already typing a part about the mig 29 beeing a verry good fighter when i read that you said someting else. My fault, english isn't my native tongue but i should have read it more carfully. Still i think you can not compare a fighter crash and a new controversial passengerjet crash about the eccects on p

[sgtdfeat]

@ghbuzt No i wasn't born back then but i don't see what that matters..And yes, i have an engineering degree in aviation but i currently do not work as one. Enough about me, Personally, when you put words in my mouth witch i didn't say to proove your point, i find that trolling.

[sgtdfeat]

@ghbuzt yes I know who Yefim Gordon is and no, i haven't read that book. Fist of all the sole reason i decided to answer because I felt you were the disrespectful one. You are the one saying you don't care what i think...respectful. My reaction isn't wrong taking in account yours. you keep on saying i can't proove anything. All i know is from reading too, but you can becasue you read a book that i didn't? I personally thought your reaction " i would expect a bit mor support as ur European" wrong

[ghbuzt]

@sgtdfeat Do you even know who Yefim Gordon is? Your messages only contain insults and hot air: you don't give a single name, not an author, not a book reference, not even a realistic analysis of the airplane market back then and you don't even compare USSR and western technology back then - and lots can be said. You call me a troll, I won't call you names, I just think that you haven't got a clue about what you're writing and that you can't prove a single bit of your numerous statements.

[ghbuzt]

@sgtdfeat Talking about a "well known fact" and "people say" doesn't prove you're right, it actually proves that you have no f'in facts to prove what you write. Second, don't even talk about trollin' as this is what you are doing mate. I'm not British and my vision isn't blurred by any of the propaganda I've been reading for the past decades. Were you even born back then to assume all your statements? Are you an airplane engineer? Have you even read a damn book before accusing others?

[ghbuzt]

@sgtdfeat Mate, talking about ignorance is the best way to hide the fact that you can't prove any of the statements you make. First of, a crash doesn't mean much if the plane's good, take Mig-29 or Su-27 family as an example: they crashed several times during air shows but are still purchased internationally. The Mirage bullshit, once again, has never been proven, never. There are other theories but all of them are hypothetical, nothing's been proven.

[sgtdfeat]

@ghbuzt Because you are British, it clouds your visions about things happening with european countrys involved with USSR? Fact is that USSR made a better plane, ok is was based on the Concorde, but it was still an improvement. I think you should read some more books because then you will probably find out that there are allways 2 sides on a storie and that in many cases the first book you read isn't all that true. You have to form your own opinion and not copy it from a book

[sgtdfeat]

@ghbuzt: I must say your ignorance amazes me. The fact that it had no commercial historie is because the fact that it crashed before the eyes of the world and with airtravelcompany wants to purchase a plane like that??? Why did it crash? because it had to dodge a french mirage.THAT IS A WELL KNOWN FACT. there is a certain probabilitie that it was on purpose (people say) but i personally don't believe that so please don't try trollinh me with that because i never said such things

[ghbuzt]

@sgtdfeat Tu-144 is such an improved version of Concorde that it never got any commercial carreer dude. And the Mirage theory has never been proven.

Being Belgian I hoped you'd be more about defending an English-French program, you know, Europe & shit, but apparently not? ANyway I don't really care about what you think, History proves you wrong.