The Problem with Faith - Richard Ackland

Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2008/08/19/Would_We_Be_Better_Off_Without_Religion

Journalist Richard Ackland argues that many religious leaders encourage people to blindly follow their beliefs, which can lead to ignorant, and even dangerous decisions.

-----

While the world's religions have inspired stunning acts of creation, they also have been implicated in some of the darkest deeds in human history.

If God cannot be blamed for such moments of evil, His priests and prophets at least have a case to answer.

So what might they say? That religion is unfairly blamed -- and that we should look to other factors? Admit that there are problems but argue that on balance the good outweighs the bad? That there is no alternative; that people need religion like they need air? - Intelligence Squared

Richard Ackland is a prominent columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald writing on legal and ethical issues. He is founder of Law Press of Australia, whose publications include The Justinian and The Gazette of Law and Journalism. Ackland has been a staunch advocate of free speech and was co-winner of the prestigious Gold Walkley for Journalism in 1999 following work as writer and presenter of the ABC's Media Watch program. Ackland has also presented ABC Radio National's breakfast program, covering a range of issues and controversies. In 2000 he was awarded the Voltaire Prize for Free Speech.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• religion
• religious
• belief
• god
• beliefs
• church
• churches
• atheist
• atheism
• sexuality
• sex
• birth
• control
• history
• progestin
• periods
• pmt
• pms
• roman
• catholic
• catholics
• priests
• stem
• cell
• cells
• research
• fundamentalists
• blind
• faith
• homosexuality
• gays
• fora.tv
• foratv
• fora
• tv

[Hooya2]

"Forget all the good things it does, like looking after the poor,the homeless,drug addicts."

Yeah, except secular organizations do the exact same thing; you don't need to believe in a cosmic Jewish zombie to care for your fellow man.

[swinkyuk]

You've obviously not listened

[vivalaleta]

@johnlyris What supernatural? There isn't any to explain.

[gibsonfan871]

---

[BBBoggs]

@johnlyris

Neither can religion.

[StudioEyeball]

@NOVAGIRL666 If I didn't know any better, I'd say you where a huge McFarlane fan.

[RichardAckland42]

Wow so my name sake is an Auzzie atheist public speaker, fantastic!...it's amazing what you find when you search for yourself on the net!

[johnlyris]

Science serves it's purpose.

However science can not explain the supernatural

[thethreeheadedmonkey]

NOVAGIRL666:

Right, because a religion prohibition wouldn't spark fanaticism.

[Ramshobraja]

Some of the same arguments that Hitchens makes. But still good.

[prostock69]

Amen sister!!!! I wholeheartedly agree!! 100 thumbs up!!

[TheGodWhisperer]

Religion "Bad"!!!