Take Action: Australian Greens Election 07
Uploader Comments (AustralianGreens)
Top Comments
-
I'll be taking Green Action and voting Democrats... they just plain do it better!
Sorry guys... great song though ;)
-
family first???? are you joking? they are a bunch of crazy nutcases. I can't believe they even have a senator. people who voted him in are mislead.
All Comments (47)
-
In 2007 Larissa Waters should have won a senate seat. the reason she did not is due to a flaw in the way we count the vote.
If you recount the QLD senate ballot excluding all candidates except the last 7 standing Larisa Waters is elected.
Greens "Guru" Luntz is not up to it. He and Brown are engaged ion a conspiracy of silence denying Australians a fair and accurate voting system
WHY?
We need to adopt Meek or the Wright re-iterative counting system
Submission 51 JSCEM CHANGE THAT COUNTS
-
ETS...is nothing but a 'AIR TAX'
I have no intentions of paying for air that is free.
-
Despite my continuing correspondence with bob brown I doubt the greens will "take action" against the sasquatch in my backyard that is terrorising my family.
-
GO THE GREENS!
I wish that every party would take the environment as seriously as them.
Nuclear power? You have GOT to be joking! Imagine the impact of another nuclear disaster, but this time in our own backyard!
Its all very well to complain about the economy, but I'm with the Greens on this one.
"No jobs on a dead planet!".
-
do u want the palestines to take over israel? if so why?
-
We should let Greens win for once. Just for the hell of it and see what happens. If they can't cut it there are always next elections and people eager to rule are plenty to choose from.
-
Uranium stores won't last that long, (remember almost ubiquitously, under 1% of all uranium is U235- the kind you need) and waste is a persistent, expensive problem. Surely proper research into improving solar, geothermal and other alternatives would be preferable.
-
Are you suggesting that it's merely trendy to be climate conscious? If it doesn't seem important now it will soon enough. If you believe that there's still a scientific debate, then you've been had by politicians that are too afraid to stick their necks out. There is no more scientific debate, there has been near complete consensus for a long time now - where's the action?
-
I tell you what, I'd rather a set of policies that take into account costs incurred beyond the next 4 years... wouldn't you? When you think about 'what benefits me' think about the impact on agriculture, fisheries and tourism (GB Reef) in Australia from climate change. Lowering petrol tax is the opposite of help! See what happens to food prices THEN, Family First!
-
is there a way to get the Greens (and others) to focus on research - to put available ideas into practice so that coal can be used without impacting the climate. This is about zero CO2 emissions - not just sticking CO2 into the ground.
Did you know that recycling produces over four times the amount of fossil fuels that making things brand new?
Sorry, but Kevin 07 for me...
NochnojDozor 4 years ago
That statistic is completely absurd. Please give some evidence if you want to be taken seriously.
AustralianGreens 4 years ago 2
Labor, Greens complicit in anti-terror laws
put the above text into your youtube search engine to see what kind of future Bob's mob are choosing.
urameshiyaaa 4 years ago
The Greens oppose the anti-terror laws consistently and are campaigning to have them repealed.
AustralianGreens 4 years ago