Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Z06 vs 06 Mustang GT

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,526
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 28, 2007

Vette vs gt mustang

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (conroyz28)

  • You people do realize this is an 1/8th mile right? I'm just sayin.. Neither of these cars are THAT fast. 1/8th also plays in the mustang's favor.

  • If u would like to race sometime and see how slow the stang really is.. Come out to Dallas and bring your check book...

  • Would never beat a C6 ZO6

  • I would now.. If you live in Dallas and have one.. Lets race for your house!!!

Top Comments

  • I live and breath Ford Mustangs all day long!

  • stangs and fords all day!

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @conroyz28 whats your stang run?

  • Wtf! This is either some really high elevation or some shitty drivers.

    my 1995 5.0 runs 9.5's - 9.6's... I only got a Bigger MAF, Cold air, headers, Flow masters, and 4.10's... And these guys got about 100+WHP on me...

  • ive had chevys... i have a ford now... i like and respect both of those cars. my dad has a vette, i have a stang. they're both great cars.

  • im a die hard ford guy but that stang in the vid did not impress me i have 2 say...srry

  • love the stang

  • vettes and chevys all day!

  • The car made 451RWHP N/A. That is with a 241/242 duration .625"/.625" lift cam on a 111LSA and Patriot heads. It has a 100 dry shot on top of that. My ego doesn't need the 402, my need for a low 9 second time slip does. H/C was listed in my first comment. It's on the stock bottom end. As for needing a 9"... A 6K dump is not nice on a 10 bolt. It's the only weak point on the car in stock form. 1.3x 60ft's consistently. I would consider that a well spent $2k.

  • Okay, a dry shot of nitrous does not equal a naturally aspirated engine. That's a power adder in my book. Besides running some chassis/suspension crap you have not mentioned what you actually did to the engine to get to 451rwhp. So it's an otherwise stock Firebird with nitrous and some suspension goodies as far as you have told us. And that you needed a 9" rear with only 451rwhp doesn't bother you? Good luck with the stroker because I'm sure your ego needs it.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more