Demolition Expert Debunks the Debunkers

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,504
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 5, 2010

Former explosives technician from Controlled Demolition, Inc explains why controlled demolition could have been used to destroy the WTC.

See also: http://visibility911.com/jmtalboo/2010/08/responding-to-joey-knobles/

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (359)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RossetaStoned91

    3 month window for what? to place charges? how and who came to this conclusion?

  • I wish he would've said why a fire wasn't possible, but yes the video is short.

  • @Denierbud11 From what I understand there was a 3 month window at some point.

  • seen the length of the video?

  • that's it, no calculations regarding the number of charges needed, time and effort required, how they did it and no one saw anything?

  • @HighVoltage963 It doesn't matter what you say when you're dealing with 9/11 conspiracy theorists. The hallmark of a conspiracy theorist is that they can construct their "theory" in such a vague way, involving secret technologies that it can't be falsified. Trust me, they have ways around your logic.

  • So wait, in order to successfully implode a building you need to fill 30% of the building, after weakening it by cutting elevators, stairs, entire walls (and ceilings mind you), and cutting structural beams. No one noticed this? No one noticed elevatars, walls, ceilings, stairs etc missing, no one noticed the thousands of pounds of explosives? Come on, really?

  • @roquefortfiles woooooo

  • @ctcole77 They're all certifiable nutjobs if you ask me. Or not very bright. One or the other. Even when you hit them with RATIONAL logical stuff, You get a pause in the argument and it goes back to something else. Its like playing a 3 card monty game with these guys. When one theory falls to pieces another one pops up to keep it all going.

    Its pathetic.

  • @roquefortfiles

    Check out Charlie Veitch. A 911 twoofer defector. He's sending the 911 twoof movement into attack mode. Of course, he MUST be COINTELPRO.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more