Poor design? (Lessons from the robots, Part I): CrEvo Rant #67 with Wazooloo
Loading...
Loading...
31:22Ian Juby responds to AronRa's "8th Foundational...by wazooloo10,004 views
- 4:40Problem solved!: CrEvo rant #35 with Wazoolooby wazooloo3,281 views
- 9:35Stupid Designby TheEvolutionGuys4,105 views
- 3:38Blue Microphones "The Pop" Universal Filter - M...by DKJANZ3,738 views
- 9:59RE CrEvo Rant # 93by SoCalAtheist676 views
- 10:19Ivor Van Heerden - The Scientistby DefendIvor9,711 views
- 4:58Neil deGrasse Tyson - Bad Designby playd7617,921 views
- 6:39The eye and the snowflake: CrEvo Rant #50 with ...by wazooloo1,730 views
- 1:55Dessa "Poor Atlas"by DoomtreeRecords37,110 views
- 9:58Cast Iron TIG Welding - Harbor Freight Vise Repairby amaedesign14,943 views
- 6:46Nylonase is not new information: CrEvo Rant #80...by wazooloo3,077 views
- 1:16Poor cycle path design - Nine Elms Lane (westbo...by westcountrytim604 views
- 7:50The boat that don't float: CrEvo Rant #78 with ...by wazooloo3,282 views
- 28:31Complete Creation, 2nd Ed., Part 18 with Wazoolooby wazooloo1,628 views
- 27:27An introduction to Ian Juby and his Creation Mi...by wazooloo3,327 views
- 6:13Portable Creation Museum projectby wazooloo4,736 views
- 7:06The Mailbag, part 1: An Angry caller: CrEvo Ran...by wazooloo6,793 views
- 9:15How Evolution Causes an Increase in Information...by cdk00720,728 views
- 5:26Jeep Wrangler Hard Door Install How Toby jeepwranglertech11,785 views
- 9:52VIVA ZWEI 2Step DJ Kabuki (Makai) vs VJ MOP Des...by Lord6addam7,122 views
@AndyG792 Why would that be? I'm posting actual science.
TheScienceFoundation 1 week ago
@AndyG792 Not sure where you went to school and I really doubt that it was claimed that it always meant useless as simply looking in the dictionary completely contradicts that. Sure it can serve a function, but it's a non-original function.
TheScienceFoundation 1 week ago
@TheScienceFoundation Is this really a science foundation? I find it hard to believe that this is a science foundation by your answers.
AndyG792 1 week ago
@TheScienceFoundation Every single time we talked about vestigial organs in class, it ALWAYS meant completely functionless and served no purpose today. We were taught that they were organs that used to have a function but no longer did. Well, one by one, each of these vestigial organs have been shown to be fully functional and serve a purpose today.
AndyG792 1 week ago
@TheScienceFoundation I don't even know how to respond to your twisting of the English language and grammar. What does atrophied, abortive, or rudimentary mean? Perhaps spending a few moments in your grade school grammar book will suffice to clear up the confusion. Nevertheless, you need to stop dancing attempting to dance between the rain drop and abandon your contrived definition of "vestigial." You discrediting yourself by using philosophy vs. facts to make your argument.
3AngelDefense1844 2 months ago
@3AngelDefense1844 Your citation still depends on vestigial meaning solely functionless, it doesn't and your own source contradicts that.
TheScienceFoundation 2 months ago
@3AngelDefense1844 'The term vestigial is used in anatomy as being more convenient in describing those parts generally known as rudimentary, abortive, atrophied, or USELESS'
or : used as a function word to indicate an alternative.
Notice it doesn't say 'and'
TheScienceFoundation 2 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation "Rudimentary organs are those that were once functional at some point in phylogeny, but are retained in current species as useless or near-useless vestiges. Such rudiments in humans include the wisdom teeth, certain muscles for moving or twitching the skin, and the vermiform appendix."—Kent G. Bailey, Human Paleopsychology: applications to aggression and pathological processes, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987), 19
3AngelDefense1844 2 months ago