Give Government A Chance

With all of the corporate malfeasance we've seen for the last 8 years, we really have to ask ourselves if government could even possibly do a worse job running the financial industry than the white collar thugs that brought us the recession. The answer, as Mike Papantonio explains in his latest Pap Attack, is "no."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Government
• Wall Street
• Bailout
• Socialism
• GOP
• White Collar
• Criminal
• Crime
• Recession
• Economy
• Pap Attack
• Mike Papantonio
• Air America Media
• Ring of Fire
• GoLeftTV
• GoLeft.tv

[coavalche]

Air America! Are you kidding! Is anybody even listening? Wasnt this station part of the "bailout" cause of such LOW RATINGS? I mean if you liberals cared about being informed, then why do your channels and airwaves have such LOW RATINGS? You guys dont give a damn about truth!

[golefttv]

Because we aren't as dependent as right wing foot soldiers on someone else to deliver us daily talking points. We're capable of developing our own opinions and doing our own research.

[killerbandit]

The ideological stance that government is good for nothing but policing and controlling a society is what landed us in this situation in the first place, it is certainly not what is going to solve the problem.

[ExileOC]

Well said!!!!! A+

[Whalemale]

Socialism, Fascism, Communism, and Capitalism are all failed systems which reveal the fallacy of the monetary system. With a resource based economy there wouldn't be money involved in which to influence and create such retchedly, regressive polices that are trashing our world.

[billthebutcher2]

You commented on it.

[shoryuken77]

Ignoring Air America means you don't give a damn about truth?

[BAhern63]

Obviously,Mike Papsmear never worked for the postal service,I did,and let me tell you it was 16 years of hell.

[allgoo19]

By the way, the video says it true, I had more problems with UPS than USPS.

[allgoo19]

One of the reason the basic capitalism failed to deliver what it promises is that the share holder don't want a company CEO that pushes long term plan but they'd vote for CEO with short term profit. If I was the share holder, I would do the same, wouldn't you?

I don't have the answer to make them choose the CEO with the long term plan. Until then, it'll keep failing.

Why it works well in other companies like Toyota? It seems to have a long term goal and accepted by the share holder.