matt dillahunty vs father hans jacobse [part 01 of 09] - human morality debate [mirror]

matt dillahunty vs father hans jacobse [part 01 of 09] - the source of human morality debate
VIDEO RELOADED

originally published by umbcOCF
as
The Source of Human Morality Debate PART 1/9

vist: http://www.youtube.com/user/umbcOCF
http://www.secularstudents.org/umbc
http://www.umbc.edu/studentlife/orgs/ocf/cms/index.php
http://www.atheist-experience.com

VOTE FOR UMBCOCFs ORIGINAL VIDEO ... !!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkMAJai5D3c

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• source
• human
• morality
• debate
• umbc
• secular
• student
• alliance
• orthodox
• christian
• fellowship
• morals
• truth
• agnosticism
• father
• hans
• jacobse
• the
• atheist
• experience
• atheism
• islam
• إِسْلامْ
• christianity
• creationism
• creation
• evolution
• darwin
• judaism
• god
• virus
• jhwh
• yhwh
• jahwe
• jehova
• יהוה‎
• allah
• الله
• jesus
• christ
• muhammed
• bible
• quran
• miracles
• moral
• reason
• faith
• satan
• spirituality
• religion
• tag
• pantheism
• deism
• philosophy
• logic
• matt
• dillahunty
• aca

[SquirrelGoneBananas]

I like the part when Matt pwns the guy from 0:00 to 14:38

[KKDragonLord]

@NewVinland "God did it" is always the easier answer

[sniped101]

@Autumn6 i can own craig in any of his arguments.

[Jshect]

@FactualAnonymity stephen hawkings is an atheist

[frandeman123]

Skip the BS, click 4:20

[Autumn6]

@trekgeek1 Matt Dillahunty couldn't even beat KabaneTheChristian, Craig would annihilate Dillahunty.

[trekgeek1]

@malikidmc

Now that second statement is one I completely agree with.

[trekgeek1]

@malikidmc

Dillahunty would have no problem with Craig. The reason they debate small time theists is because people like Craig charge a lot of money to make an appearance. These local organizations like the ACA will not pay Craig that money to preach. All the Christian apologists publish books constantly as well. Craig sells mp3's on iTunes. They are all trying to make money. Dawkins is actually a respected biologist, so it makes sense that his books would be well accepted.

[chaoszieg]

@FactualAnonymity

Ah quote mining.

though neither Harkings nor Einsein's quotes you posted suggest in any way shape or form a creator.

As for Fred Hoyle, he didn't except the big bang because he believe it lent credibility to the idea of a creator(god) He also believed that life on earth was caused by viruses landing here on meteors.

So you're going to take someone who thinks there is no god, and life was created by virus injected rocks as your source for science pointing to god?

[FactualAnonymity]

@chaoszieg "The scientist is possessed by the sense of universal causation...His religious feeling takes the form of rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals the intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.

- Albert Einstein (theoretical physicist, agnostic)

[FactualAnonymity]

@chaoszieg "A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."

- Fred Hoyle (astrophysicist)

[FactualAnonymity]

@chaoszieg What scientific law points to there being no creator?

"The laws of science, as we know them at the present, contain many fundamental numbers, like the size of the electron charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton to the electron... The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development for life."

- Stephen Hawking (theoretical physicist, atheist) (italics added for emphasis)